Sirolimus - Sirolimus solution Prescribing Information
5.1 Increased Susceptibility to Infection and the Possible Development of LymphomaIncreased susceptibility to infection and the possible development of lymphoma and other malignancies, particularly of the skin, may result from immunosuppression. The rates of lymphoma/lymphoproliferative disease observed in Studies 1 and 2 were 0.7 to 3.2% (for sirolimus -treated patients) versus 0.6 to 0.8% (azathioprine and placebo control) [
5.2 Liver Transplantation – Excess Mortality, Graft Loss, and Hepatic Artery ThrombosisThe safety and efficacy of sirolimus as immunosuppressive therapy have not been established in liver transplant patients; therefore, such use is not recommended. The use of sirolimus has been associated with adverse outcomes in patients following liver transplantation, including excess mortality, graft loss and hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT).
In a study in
In this and another study in
In a clinical study in stable liver transplant patients 6 to 144 months post-liver transplantation and receiving a CNI-based regimen, an increased number of deaths was observed in the group converted to a sirolimus-based regimen compared to the group who was continued on a CNI-based regimen, although the difference was not statistically significant (3.8% versus 1.4%) [
5.3 Lung Transplantation – Bronchial Anastomotic DehiscenceCases of bronchial anastomotic dehiscence, most fatal, have been reported in
The safety and efficacy of sirolimus as immunosuppressive therapy have not been established in lung transplant patients; therefore, such use is not recommended.
• Liver Transplantation – Excess Mortality, Graft Loss, and Hepatic Artery Thrombosis (HAT)
5.2 Liver Transplantation – Excess Mortality, Graft Loss, and Hepatic Artery ThrombosisThe safety and efficacy of sirolimus as immunosuppressive therapy have not been established in liver transplant patients; therefore, such use is not recommended. The use of sirolimus has been associated with adverse outcomes in patients following liver transplantation, including excess mortality, graft loss and hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT).
In a study in
In this and another study in
In a clinical study in stable liver transplant patients 6 to 144 months post-liver transplantation and receiving a CNI-based regimen, an increased number of deaths was observed in the group converted to a sirolimus-based regimen compared to the group who was continued on a CNI-based regimen, although the difference was not statistically significant (3.8% versus 1.4%) [
5.3 Lung Transplantation – Bronchial Anastomotic DehiscenceCases of bronchial anastomotic dehiscence, most fatal, have been reported in
The safety and efficacy of sirolimus as immunosuppressive therapy have not been established in lung transplant patients; therefore, such use is not recommended.
• Sirolimus oral solution is an mTOR inhibitor immunosuppressant indicated for the prophylaxis of organ rejection in patients aged ≥13 years receiving renal transplants:
o Patients at low- to moderate-immunologic risk: Use initially with cyclosporine (CsA) and corticosteroids. CsA withdrawal is recommended 2 to 4 months after transplantation (
1.1 Prophylaxis of Organ Rejection in Renal TransplantationSirolimus oral solution is indicated for the prophylaxis of organ rejection in patients aged 13 years or older receiving renal transplants.
o Patients at high-immunologic risk: Use in combination with CsA and corticosteroids for the first 12 months following transplantation (
1.1 Prophylaxis of Organ Rejection in Renal TransplantationSirolimus oral solution is indicated for the prophylaxis of organ rejection in patients aged 13 years or older receiving renal transplants.
1.1 Prophylaxis of Organ Rejection in Renal TransplantationSirolimus oral solution is indicated for the prophylaxis of organ rejection in patients aged 13 years or older receiving renal transplants.
1.2 Limitations of Use in Renal TransplantationCyclosporine withdrawal has not been studied in patients with Banff Grade 3 acute rejection or vascular rejection prior to cyclosporine withdrawal, those who are dialysis-dependent, those with serum creatinine >4.5 mg/dL, Black patients, patients of multi-organ transplants, secondary transplants, or those with high levels of panel-reactive antibodies [
The safety and efficacy of
The safety and efficacy of
14.3 High-Immunologic Risk Renal Transplant PatientsSirolimus was studied in a one-year, clinical trial in high risk patients (Study 4) who were defined as Black transplant recipients and/or repeat renal transplant recipients who lost a previous allograft for immunologic reasons and/or patients with high panel-reactive antibodies (PRA; peak PRA level >80%). Patients received concentration-controlled sirolimus and cyclosporine (MODIFIED), and corticosteroids per local practice. The sirolimus dose was adjusted to achieve target whole blood trough sirolimus concentrations of 10 to 15 ng/mL (chromatographic method) throughout the 12-month study period. The cyclosporine dose was adjusted to achieve target whole blood trough concentrations of 200 to 300 ng/mL through week 2, 150 to 200 ng/mL from week 2 to week 26, and 100 to 150 ng/mL from week 26 to week 52 [
Parameter | Sirolimus with Cyclosporine, Corticosteroids (n = 224) |
| Efficacy Failure (%) | 23.2 |
| Graft Loss or Death (%) | 9.8 |
| Renal Function (mean ± SEM)a,b | 52.6 ± 1.6 (n = 222) |
a: Calculated glomerular filtration rate by Nankivell equation.
b: Patients who had graft loss were included in this analysis with GFR set to 0.
Patient survival at 12 months was 94.6%. The incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection was 17.4% and the majority of the episodes of acute rejection were mild in severity.
• Sirolimus oral solution is an mTOR inhibitor indicated for the treatment of patients with lymphangioleiomyomatosis (
1.3 Treatment of Patients with LymphangioleiomyomatosisSirolimus oral solution is indicated for the treatment of patients with lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM).
Sirolimus oral solution is to be administered orally once daily, consistently with or without food [
2.5 Therapeutic Drug MonitoringMonitoring of sirolimus trough concentrations is recommended for all patients, especially in those patients likely to have altered drug metabolism, in patients ≥ 13 years who weigh less than 40 kg, in patients with hepatic impairment, when a change in the sirolimus oral solution dosage form is made, and during concurrent administration of strong CYP3A4 inducers and inhibitors [
Therapeutic drug monitoring should not be the sole basis for adjusting sirolimus oral solution therapy. Careful attention should be made to clinical signs/symptoms, tissue biopsy findings, and laboratory parameters.
When used in combination with cyclosporine, sirolimus trough concentrations should be maintained within the target-range [
The above recommended 24-hour trough concentration ranges for sirolimus are based on chromatographic methods. Currently in clinical practice, sirolimus whole blood concentrations are being measured by both chromatographic and immunoassay methodologies. Because the measured sirolimus whole blood concentrations depend on the type of assay used, the concentrations obtained by these different methodologies are not interchangeable [
12.3 PharmacokineticsSirolimus pharmacokinetics activity have been determined following oral administration in healthy subjects, pediatric patients, hepatically impaired patients, and renal transplant patients.
The pharmacokinetic parameters of sirolimus in low- to moderate-immunologic risk adult renal transplant patients following multiple dosing with sirolimus 2 mg daily, in combination with cyclosporine and corticosteroids, is summarized in Table 4.
| Multiple Dose (daily dose) | ||
| Solution | Tablets | |
| Cmax(ng/mL) | 14.4 ± 5.3 | 15.0 ± 4.9 |
| tmax(hr) | 2.1 ± 0.8 | 3.5 ± 2.4 |
| AUC (ng•h/mL) | 194 ± 78 | 230 ± 67 |
| Cmin(ng/mL)c | 7.1 ± 3.5 | 7.6 ± 3.1 |
| CL/F (mL/h/kg) | 173 ± 50 | 139 ± 63 |
a: In presence of cyclosporine administered 4 hours before sirolimus dosing.
b: Based on data collected at months 1 and 3 post-transplantation.
c: Average Cminover 6 months.
Whole blood trough sirolimus concentrations, as measured by LC/MS/MS in renal transplant patients, were significantly correlated with AUCτ,ss. Upon repeated, twice-daily administration without an initial loading dose in a multiple-dose study, the average trough concentration of sirolimus increases approximately 2- to 3-fold over the initial 6 days of therapy, at which time steady-state is reached. A loading dose of 3 times the maintenance dose will provide near steady-state concentrations within 1 day in most patients [
Following administration of sirolimus oral solution, the mean times to peak concentration (tmax) of sirolimus are approximately 1 hour and 2 hours in healthy subjects and renal transplant patients, respectively. The systemic availability of sirolimus is low, and was estimated to be approximately 14% after the administration of sirolimus oral solution. In healthy subjects, the mean bioavailability of sirolimus after administration of the tablet is approximately 27% higher relative to the solution. Sirolimus tablets are not bioequivalent to the solution; however, clinical equivalence has been demonstrated at the 2 mg dose level. Sirolimus concentrations, following the administration of sirolimus oral solution to stable renal transplant patients, are dose-proportional between 3 and 12 mg/m2.
To minimize variability in sirolimus concentrations, sirolimus oral solution should be taken consistently with or without food [
The mean (± SD) blood-to-plasma ratio of sirolimus was 36 ± 18 in stable renal allograft patients, indicating that sirolimus is extensively partitioned into formed blood elements. The mean volume of distribution (Vss/F) of sirolimus is 12 ± 8 L/kg. Sirolimus is extensively bound (approximately 92%) to human plasma proteins, mainly serum albumin (97%), α1-acid glycoprotein, and lipoproteins.
Sirolimus is a substrate for both CYP3A4 and P-gp. Sirolimus is extensively metabolized in the intestinal wall and liver and undergoes counter-transport from enterocytes of the small intestine into the gut lumen. Inhibitors of CYP3A4 and P-gp increase sirolimus concentrations. Inducers of CYP3A4 and P-gp decrease sirolimus concentrations [
After a single dose of [14C] sirolimus oral solution in healthy volunteers, the majority (91%) of radioactivity was recovered from the feces, and only a minor amount (2.2%) was excreted in urine. The mean ± SD terminal elimination half-life (t½) of sirolimus after multiple dosing in stable renal transplant patients was estimated to be about 62 ± 16 hours.
The following sirolimus concentrations (chromatographic equivalent) were observed in phase 3 clinical studies for prophylaxis of organ rejection in
Patient Population (Study number) | Treatment | Year 1 | Year 3 | ||
Mean (ng/mL) | 10thto 90thpercentiles (ng/mL) | Mean (ng/mL) | 10thto 90thpercentiles ng/mL) | ||
| Low-to-moderate risk (Studies 1 & 2) | Sirolimus (2 mg/day) + CsA | 7.2 | 3.6 to 11 | – | – |
| Sirolimus (5 mg/day) + CsA | 14 | 8 to 22 | – | – | |
| Low-to-moderate risk (Study 3) | Sirolimus + CsA | 8.6 | 5 to 13a | 9.1 | 5.4 to 14 |
| Sirolimus alone | 19 | 14 to 22a | 16 | 11 to 22 | |
| High risk (Study 4) | Sirolimus + CsA | 15.7 | 5.4 to 27.3b | – | – |
| 11.8 | 6.2 to 16.9c | ||||
| 11.5 | 6.3 to 17.3d | ||||
a: Months 4 through 12
b: Up to Week 2; observed CsA Cminwas 217 (56 to 432) ng/mL
c: Week 2 to Week 26; observed CsA Cminrange was 174 (71 to 288) ng/mL
d: Week 26 to Week 52; observed CsA Cminwas 136 (54. to 218) ng/mL
The withdrawal of cyclosporine and concurrent increases in sirolimus trough concentrations to steady-state required approximately 6 weeks. Following cyclosporine withdrawal, larger sirolimus doses were required due to the absence of the inhibition of sirolimus metabolism and transport by cyclosporine and to achieve higher target sirolimus trough concentrations during concentration-controlled administration [
In a clinical trial of patients with lymphangioleiomyomatosis, the median whole blood sirolimus trough concentration after 3 weeks of receiving sirolimus tablets at a dose of 2 mg/day was 6.8 ng/mL (interquartile range 4.6 to 9.0 ng/mL; n = 37).
Sirolimus was administered as a single, oral dose to subjects with normal hepatic function and to patients with Child-Pugh classification A (mild), B (moderate), or C (severe) hepatic impairment. Compared with the values in the normal hepatic function group, the patients with mild, moderate, and severe hepatic impairment had 43%, 94%, and 189% higher mean values for sirolimus AUC, respectively, with no statistically significant differences in mean Cmax. As the severity of hepatic impairment increased, there were steady increases in mean sirolimus t1/2, and decreases in the mean sirolimus clearance normalized for body weight (CL/F/kg).
The maintenance dose of sirolimus should be reduced by approximately one third in patients with mild-to-moderate hepatic impairment and by approximately one half in patients with severe hepatic impairment [
The effect of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of sirolimus is not known. However, there is minimal (2.2%) renal excretion of the drug or its metabolites in healthy volunteers. The loading and the maintenance doses of sirolimus need not be adjusted in patients with renal impairment [
Sirolimus pharmacokinetic data were collected in concentration-controlled trials of pediatric renal transplant patients who were also receiving cyclosporine and corticosteroids. The target ranges for trough concentrations were either 10 to 20 ng/mL for the 21 children receiving tablets, or 5 to 15 ng/mL for the one child receiving oral solution. The children aged 6 to 11 years (n = 8) received mean ± SD doses of 1.75 ± 0.71 mg/day (0.064 ± 0.018 mg/kg, 1.65 ± 0.43 mg/m2). The children aged 12 to 18 years (n = 14) received mean ± SD doses of 2.79 ± 1.25 mg/day (0.053 ± 0.0150 mg/kg, 1.86 ± 0.61 mg/m2). At the time of sirolimus blood sampling for pharmacokinetic evaluation, the majority (80%) of these pediatric patients received the sirolimus dose at 16 hours after the once-daily cyclosporine dose. See Table 6 below.
Age (y) | n | Body Weight (kg) | Cmax (ng/mL) | tmax,ss (h) | Cmin,ss (ng/mL) | AUCT,ss (ng•h/mL) | CL/Fc (mL/h/Kg) | CL/Fc (L/h/m2) |
| 6 to 11 | 8 | 27 ± 10 | 22.1 ± 8.9 | 5.88 ± 4.05 | 10.6 ± 4.3 | 356 ± 127 | 214 ± 129 | 5.4 ± 2.8 |
| 12 to 18 | 14 | 52 ± 15 | 34.5 ± 12.2 | 2.7 ± 1.5 | 14.7 ± 8.6 | 466 ± 236 | 136 ± 57 | 4.7 ± 1.9 |
a: Sirolimus co-administered with cyclosporine oral solution [MODIFIED] (e.g., Neoral®Oral Solution) and/or cyclosporine capsules
[MODIFIED] (e.g., Neoral®Soft Gelatin Capsules).
b: As measured by Liquid Chromatographic/Tandem Mass Spectrometric Method (LC/MS/MS)
c: Oral-dose clearance adjusted by either body weight (kg) or body surface area (m2).
Table 7 below summarizes pharmacokinetic data obtained in pediatric dialysis patients with chronically impaired renal function.
| Age Group (y) | n | tmax(h) | t1/2(h) | CL/F/WT(mL/h/kg) |
| 5 to 11 | 9 | 1.1 ± 0.5 | 71 ± 40 | 580 ± 450 |
| 12 to 18 | 11 | 0.79 ± 0.17 | 55 ± 18 | 450 ± 232 |
* All subjects received sirolimus oral solution.
Clinical studies of sirolimus did not include a sufficient number of patients >65 years of age to determine whether they will respond differently than younger patients. After the administration of sirolimus oral solution or tablets, sirolimus trough concentration data in renal transplant patients >65 years of age were similar to those in the adult population 18 to 65 years of age.
Sirolimus clearance in males was 12% lower than that in females; male subjects had a significantly longer t1/2than did female subjects (72.3 hours versus 61.3 hours). Dose adjustments based on gender are not recommended.
In the phase 3 trials for the prophylaxis of organ rejection following renal transplantation using sirolimus solution or tablets and cyclosporine oral solution [MODIFIED] (e.g., Neoral®Oral Solution) and/or cyclosporine capsules [MODIFIED] (e.g., Neoral®Soft Gelatin Capsules) [
Sirolimus is known to be a substrate for both cytochrome CYP3A4 and P-gp. The pharmacokinetic interaction between sirolimus and concomitantly administered drugs is discussed below. Drug interaction studies have not been conducted with drugs other than those described below.
In a single-dose drug-drug interaction study, 24 healthy volunteers were administered 10 mg sirolimus tablets either simultaneously or 4 hours after a 300-mg dose of Neoral®Soft Gelatin Capsules (cyclosporine capsules [MODIFIED]). For simultaneous administration, mean Cmaxand AUC were increased by 512% and 148%, respectively, relative to administration of sirolimus alone. However, when given 4 hours after cyclosporine administration, sirolimus Cmaxand AUC were both increased by only 33% compared with administration of sirolimus alone.
In a single dose drug-drug interaction study, 24 healthy volunteers were administered 10 mg sirolimus oral solution either simultaneously or 4 hours after a 300 mg dose of Neoral®Soft Gelatin Capsules (cyclosporine capsules [MODIFIED]). For simultaneous administration, the mean Cmaxand AUC of sirolimus, following simultaneous administration were increased by 116% and 230%, respectively, relative to administration of sirolimus alone. However, when given 4 hours after Neoral®Soft Gelatin Capsules (cyclosporine capsules [MODIFIED]) administration, sirolimus Cmaxand AUC were increased by only 37% and 80%, respectively, compared with administration of sirolimus alone.
In a single-dose cross-over drug-drug interaction study, 33 healthy volunteers received 5 mg sirolimus oral solution alone, 2 hours before, and 2 hours after a 300 mg dose of Neoral®Soft Gelatin Capsules (cyclosporine capsules [MODIFIED]). When given 2 hours before Neoral®Soft Gelatin Capsules (cyclosporine capsules [MODIFIED]) administration, sirolimus Cmaxand AUC were comparable to those with administration of sirolimus alone. However, when given 2 hours after, the mean Cmaxand AUC of sirolimus were increased by 126% and 141%, respectively, relative to administration of sirolimus alone.
Mean cyclosporine Cmaxand AUC were not significantly affected when sirolimus oral solution was given simultaneously or when administered 4 hours after Neoral®Soft Gelatin Capsules (cyclosporine capsules [MODIFIED]). However, after multiple-dose administration of sirolimus given 4 hours after Neoral®in renal post-transplant patients over 6 months, cyclosporine oral-dose clearance was reduced, and lower doses of Neoral®Soft Gelatin Capsules (cyclosporine capsules [MODIFIED]) were needed to maintain target cyclosporine concentration.
In a multiple-dose study in 150 psoriasis patients, sirolimus 0.5, 1.5, and 3 mg/m2/day was administered simultaneously with Sandimmune®Oral Solution (cyclosporine Oral Solution) 1.25 mg/kg/day. The increase in average sirolimus trough concentrations ranged between 67% to 86% relative to when sirolimus was administered without cyclosporine. The intersubject variability (% CV) for sirolimus trough concentrations ranged from 39.7% to 68.7%. There was no significant effect of multiple-dose sirolimus on cyclosporine trough concentrations following Sandimmune®Oral Solution (cyclosporine oral solution) administration. However, the % CV was higher (range 85.9% to 165%) than those from previous studies.
Clinically significant pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions were not observed in studies of drugs listed below. Sirolimus and these drugs may be co-administered without dose adjustments.
• Acyclovir
• Atorvastatin
• Digoxin
• Glyburide
• Nifedipine
• Norgestrel/ethinyl estradiol (Lo/Ovral®)
• Prednisolone
• Sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (Bactrim®)
Co-administration of sirolimus with other known strong inhibitors of CYP3A4 and/or P-gp (such as voriconazole, itraconazole, telithromycin, or clarithromycin) or other known strong inducers of CYP3A4 and/or P-gp (such as rifabutin) is not recommended [
Care should be exercised when drugs or other substances that are substrates and/or inhibitors or inducers of CYP3A4 are administered concomitantly with sirolimus. Other drugs that have the potential to increase sirolimus blood concentrations include (but are not limited to):
• Calcium channel blockers: nicardipine.
• Antifungal agents: clotrimazole, fluconazole.
• Antibiotics: troleandomycin.
• Gastrointestinal prokinetic agents: cisapride, metoclopramide.
• Other drugs: bromocriptine, cimetidine, danazol, letermovir,
Other drugs that have the potential to decrease sirolimus concentrations include (but are not limited to):
• Anticonvulsants: carbamazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin.
• Antibiotics: rifapentine.
Grapefruit juice reduces CYP3A4-mediated drug metabolism. Grapefruit juice must not be taken with or used for dilution of sirolimus [
St. John’s Wort (
• Oral Solution: 60 mg per 60 mL in amber glass bottle (
3.1 Sirolimus Oral Solution• 60 mg per 60 mL in amber glass bottle.
• Pregnancy: Based on animal data can cause fetal harm (
5.15 Embryo-Fetal ToxicityBased on animal studies and the mechanism of action [
8.1 PregnancyBased on animal studies and the mechanism of action, sirolimus can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman [
The estimated background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage for the indicated population is unknown. In the U.S. general population, the estimated background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage in clinically recognized pregnancies is 2 to 4% and 15 to 20%, respectively.
Sirolimus crossed the placenta and was toxic to the conceptus.
In rat embryo-fetal development studies, pregnant rats were administered sirolimus orally during the period of organogenesis (Gestational Day 6 to 15). Sirolimus produced embryo-fetal lethality at 0.5 mg/kg (2.5-fold the clinical dose of 2 mg, on a body surface area basis) and reduced fetal weight at 1 mg/kg (5-fold the clinical dose of 2 mg). The no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) for fetal toxicity in rats was 0.1 mg/kg (0.5-fold the clinical dose of 2 mg). Maternal toxicity (weight loss) was observed at 2 mg/kg (10-fold the clinical dose of 2 mg). The NOAEL for maternal toxicity was 1 mg/kg. In combination with cyclosporine, rats had increased embryo-fetal mortality compared with sirolimus alone.
In rabbit embryo-fetal development studies, pregnant rabbits were administered sirolimus orally during the period of organogenesis (Gestational Day 6 to 18). There were no effects on embryo-fetal development at doses up to 0.05 mg/kg (0.5-fold the clinical dose of 2 mg, on a body surface area basis); however, at doses of 0.05 mg/kg and above, the ability to sustain a successful pregnancy was impaired (i.e., embryo-fetal abortion or early resorption). Maternal toxicity (decreased body weight) was observed at 0.05 mg/kg. The NOAEL for maternal toxicity was 0.025 mg/kg (0.25-fold the clinical dose of 2 mg).
In a pre- and post-natal development study in rats, pregnant females were dosed during gestation and lactation (Gestational Day 6 through Lactation Day 20). An increased incidence of dead pups, resulting in reduced live litter size, occurred at 0.5 mg/kg (2.5-fold the clinical dose of 2 mg/kg on a body surface area basis). At 0.1 mg/kg (0.5-fold the clinical dose of 2 mg), there were no adverse effects on offspring. Sirolimus did not cause maternal toxicity or affect developmental parameters in the surviving offspring (morphological development, motor activity, learning, or fertility assessment) at 0.5 mg/kg, the highest dose tested.
• Lactation: Potential for serious adverse effects in breastfed infants based on mechanism of action (
8.2 LactationIt is not known whether sirolimus is present in human milk. There are no data on its effects on the breastfed infant or milk production. The pharmacokinetic and safety profiles of sirolimus in infants are not known. Sirolimus is present in the milk of lactating rats. There is potential for serious adverse effects from sirolimus in breastfed infants based on mechanism of action [
• Females and Males of Reproductive Potential: May impair fertility (
8.1 PregnancyBased on animal studies and the mechanism of action, sirolimus can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman [
The estimated background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage for the indicated population is unknown. In the U.S. general population, the estimated background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage in clinically recognized pregnancies is 2 to 4% and 15 to 20%, respectively.
Sirolimus crossed the placenta and was toxic to the conceptus.
In rat embryo-fetal development studies, pregnant rats were administered sirolimus orally during the period of organogenesis (Gestational Day 6 to 15). Sirolimus produced embryo-fetal lethality at 0.5 mg/kg (2.5-fold the clinical dose of 2 mg, on a body surface area basis) and reduced fetal weight at 1 mg/kg (5-fold the clinical dose of 2 mg). The no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) for fetal toxicity in rats was 0.1 mg/kg (0.5-fold the clinical dose of 2 mg). Maternal toxicity (weight loss) was observed at 2 mg/kg (10-fold the clinical dose of 2 mg). The NOAEL for maternal toxicity was 1 mg/kg. In combination with cyclosporine, rats had increased embryo-fetal mortality compared with sirolimus alone.
In rabbit embryo-fetal development studies, pregnant rabbits were administered sirolimus orally during the period of organogenesis (Gestational Day 6 to 18). There were no effects on embryo-fetal development at doses up to 0.05 mg/kg (0.5-fold the clinical dose of 2 mg, on a body surface area basis); however, at doses of 0.05 mg/kg and above, the ability to sustain a successful pregnancy was impaired (i.e., embryo-fetal abortion or early resorption). Maternal toxicity (decreased body weight) was observed at 0.05 mg/kg. The NOAEL for maternal toxicity was 0.025 mg/kg (0.25-fold the clinical dose of 2 mg).
In a pre- and post-natal development study in rats, pregnant females were dosed during gestation and lactation (Gestational Day 6 through Lactation Day 20). An increased incidence of dead pups, resulting in reduced live litter size, occurred at 0.5 mg/kg (2.5-fold the clinical dose of 2 mg/kg on a body surface area basis). At 0.1 mg/kg (0.5-fold the clinical dose of 2 mg), there were no adverse effects on offspring. Sirolimus did not cause maternal toxicity or affect developmental parameters in the surviving offspring (morphological development, motor activity, learning, or fertility assessment) at 0.5 mg/kg, the highest dose tested.
8.3 Females and Males of Reproductive PotentialFemales should not be pregnant or become pregnant while receiving sirolimus . Advise females of reproductive potential that animal studies have been shown sirolimus to be harmful to the developing fetus. Females of reproductive potential are recommended to use highly effective contraceptive method. Effective contraception must be initiated before sirolimus therapy, during sirolimus therapy, and for 12 weeks after sirolimus therapy has been stopped [
Based on clinical findings and findings in animals, male and female fertility may be compromised by the treatment with sirolimus [
13.1 Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of FertilityCarcinogenicity studies were conducted in mice and rats. In an 86-week female mouse study at sirolimus doses 30 to 120 times higher than the 2 mg daily clinical dose (adjusted for body surface area), there was a statistically significant increase in malignant lymphoma at all dose levels compared with controls. In a second mouse study at dosages that were approximately 3 to 16 times the clinical dose (adjusted for body surface area), hepatocellular adenoma and carcinoma in males were considered sirolimus-related. In the 104-week rat study at dosages equal to or lower than the clinical dose of 2 mg daily (adjusted for body surface area), there were no significant findings.
Sirolimus was not genotoxic in the
When female rats were treated by oral gavage with sirolimus and mated to untreated males, female fertility was decreased at 0.5 mg/kg (2.5-fold the clinical dose of 2 mg, on a body surface area basis) due to decreased implantation. In addition, reduced ovary and uterus weight were observed. The NOAEL for female rat fertility was 0.1 mg/kg (0.5-fold the clinical dose of 2 mg).
When male rats were treated by oral gavage with sirolimus and mated to untreated females, male fertility was decreased at 2 mg/kg (9.7-fold the clinical dose of 2 mg, on a body surface area basis). Atrophy of testes, epididymides, prostate, seminiferous tubules, and reduced sperm counts were observed. The NOAEL for male rat fertility was 0.5 mg/kg (2.5-fold the clinical dose of 2 mg).
Testicular tubular degeneration was also seen in a 4-week intravenous study of sirolimus in monkeys at 0.1 mg/kg (1-fold the clinical dose of 2 mg, on a body surface area basis).
Sirolimus oral solution is contraindicated in patients with a hypersensitivity to sirolimus [
5.4 Hypersensitivity ReactionsHypersensitivity reactions, including anaphylactic/anaphylactoid reactions, angioedema, exfoliative dermatitis and hypersensitivity vasculitis, have been associated with the administration of sirolimus [