Get your patient on Akynzeo (Netupitant And Palonosetron)

Get prior auth formsAccess all prior auth forms in one place.
card icon
Find savingsGet a list of every active savings program and copay card.
card icon
Medication interactionsReview all medication interactions instantly.
card icon
  • Loading interactions...

Akynzeo prior authorization resources

Most recent Akynzeo prior authorization forms

Most recent state uniform prior authorization forms

Akynzeo patient education

Patient toolkit

Dosage & administration

onehub-banner
Financial assistance programs for Akynzeo Get a list of every active savings program and copay card, along with eligibility criteria and enrollment forms.
PrescriberAI is currently offline. Try again later.

By using PrescriberAI, you agree to the AI Terms of Use.

This AI tool offers medical information for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical judgment or advice. Physicians and healthcare professionals should exercise their expertise and discretion when interpreting and applying the provided information to specific clinical situations.

Akynzeo prescribing information

Indications & Usage

INDICATIONS AND USAGE

  • AKYNZEO capsules is indicated in combination with dexamethasone in adults for the prevention of acute and delayed nausea and vomiting associated with initial and repeat courses of cancer chemotherapy, including, but not limited to, highly emetogenic chemotherapy. AKYNZEO capsules is a combination of palonosetron and netupitant: palonosetron prevents nausea and vomiting during the acute phase and netupitant prevents nausea and vomiting during both the acute and delayed phase after cancer chemotherapy.
  • AKYNZEO for injection and AKYNZEO injection are indicated in combination with dexamethasone in adults for the prevention of acute and delayed nausea and vomiting associated with initial and repeat courses of highly emetogenic cancer chemotherapy. AKYNZEO for injection is a combination of palonosetron and fosnetupitant, a prodrug of netupitant: palonosetron prevents nausea and vomiting during the acute phase and fosnetupitant prevents nausea and vomiting during both the acute and delayed phase after cancer chemotherapy.
    Limitations of Use

    AKYNZEO for injection and AKYNZEO injection have not been studied for the prevention of nausea and vomiting associated with anthracycline plus cyclophosphamide chemotherapy.
Dosage & Administration
Dosage Forms & Strengths
Pregnancy & Lactation
Contraindications
Warnings & Precautions
Adverse Reactions
Drug Interactions
Description
Pharmacology
Nonclinical Toxicology
Clinical Studies

CLINICAL STUDIES

Study 1

In a multicenter, randomized, parallel, double-blind, controlled clinical trial of 694 patients, the efficacy and safety of a single dose of oral netupitant in combination with oral palonosetron was compared with a single oral dose of palonosetron in cancer patients receiving a chemotherapy regimen that included cisplatin (median dose of 75 mg/m 2 ). The efficacy of AKYNZEO was assessed in 135 patients who received AKYNZEO capsules (300 mg netupitant and 0.5 mg palonosetron) and 136 patients who received oral palonosetron 0.5 mg.

Treatment regimens for the AKYNZEO and palonosetron arms are summarized in Table 16.

Table 16: Oral Antiemetic Treatment Regimen in Study 1

Treatment Regimen

Day 1

Days 2 to 4

AKYNZEO

AKYNZEO capsules:  300 mg neupitant/

0.5 mg palonosetron

Dexamethasone 12 mg

Dexamethasone 8 mg once a day

Palonosetron

Palonosetron 0.5 mg

Dexamethasone 20 mg

Dexamethasone 8 mg twice a day

Of the 135 patients who received AKYNZEO, 43% were women, and all patients were White. The age ranged from 19 to 77 years, with a median age of 53 years.

During the study, 86% of the 135 treated patients in the AKYNZEO arm received a concomitant chemotherapeutic agent in addition to protocol-mandated cisplatin. The most common chemotherapeutic agents and the proportion of patients exposed were cyclophosphamide (34%), fluorouracil (24%), etoposide (21%), and doxorubicin (16%).

The key efficacy endpoints were complete response (CR) (defined as no emetic episode and no use of rescue medication) for the 25 to 120 hour interval (delayed phase), CR for the 0 to 24 hour interval (acute phase), and CR within 120 hours (overall phase) after the start of the chemotherapy administration.

A summary of the key results from this study is shown in Table 17.

Table 17: Proportion of Patients Responding by Treatment Group and Phase in Study 1

AKYNZEO Capsules
300 mg netupitant/
0.5 mg palonosetron (N=135)

Palonosetron
0.5 mg (N=136)

p-value Adjusted p-values for multiple comparisons using Cochran Mantel Haenszel test, stratified by gender.

COMPLETE RESPONSE

Delayed Phase Delayed phase: 25 to 120 hours post-cisplatin treatment.

90.4

80.1

0.032

Acute Phase Acute phase: 0 to 24 hours post-cisplatin treatment.

98.5

89.7

0.002

Overall Phase Overall: 0 to 120 hours post-cisplatin treatment.

89.6

76.5

0.003

Study 2 (NCT01339260 )

In a multicenter, randomized, parallel, double-blind, active controlled, superiority trial, the efficacy and safety of a single oral dose of AKYNZEO was compared with a single oral dose of palonosetron 0.5 mg in cancer patients scheduled to receive the first cycle of an anthracycline and cyclophosphamide (AC) regimen for the treatment of a solid malignant tumor (Study 2). All patients received a single oral dose of dexamethasone. Treatment regimens for the AKYNZEO and palonosetron arms are summarized in Table 18.

Table 18: Oral Antiemetic Treatment Regimen in Study 2

Treatment Regimen

Day 1

Days 2 to 3

AKYNZEO

AKYNZEO capsules: 300 mg  netupitant/

0.5 mg palonosetron

Dexamethasone 12 mg

No antiemetic treatment

Palonosetron

Palonosetron 0.5 mg

Dexamethasone 20 mg

No antiemetic treatment

After completion of cycle 1, patients had the option to participate in a multiple-cycle extension, receiving the same treatment as assigned in cycle 1. There was no pre-specified limit of the number of repeat consecutive cycles for any patient.

A total of 1455 patients were randomized to the AKYNZEO arm or palonosetron arm. A total of 1450 patients (AKYNZEO n=725; palonosetron n=725) received study medication: of these, 1438 patients (99%) completed cycle 1 and 1286 patients (88%) continued treatment in the multiple‑cycle extension. A total of 907 patients (62%) completed the multiple‑cycle extension up to a maximum of eight treatment cycles.

Of the 725 patients who received AKYNZEO, 711 (98%) were women; 79% were White, 14% Asian, 6% Hispanic, and <1% were Black or Other. Age ranged from 22 to 79 years, with a median age of 54 years. A total of 724 patients (99.9%) were treated with cyclophosphamide. All patients were additionally treated with either doxorubicin (68%) or epirubicin (32%).

During the first cycle, 32% of the 725 patients treated with AKYNZEO received a concomitant chemotherapeutic agent in addition to protocol-mandated regimens, with the most common chemotherapeutic being fluorouracil (28%) and docetaxel (3%).

The primary efficacy endpoint was the CR rate in the delayed phase, 25 to120 hours after the start of chemotherapy administration.

Major secondary efficacy endpoints included CR for the acute and overall phases. A summary of key results from Study 2 is shown in Table 19.

Table 19: Proportion of Patients Responding by Treatment Group and Phase Cycle 1 in Study 2

AKYNZEO Capsules
300 mg netupitant/
0.5 mg palonosetron
N=724
%

Palonosetron
0.5 mg
N=725
%

p-value p-value from Cochran Mantel Haenszel test, stratified by age class and region.

PRIMARY ENDPOINT

COMPLETE RESPONSE

Delayed Phase Delayed phase: 25 to 120 hours after anthracycline and cyclophosphamide regimen.

76.9

69.5

0.001

MAJOR SECONDARY ENDPOINTS

COMPLETE RESPONSE

Acute Phase Acute phase: 0 to 24 hours after anthracycline and cyclophosphamide regimen.

88.4

85.0

0.047

Overall Phase Overall: 0 to 120 hours after anthracycline and cyclophosphamide regimen.

74.3

66.6

0.001

Multiple Cycles

Patients continued into the Multiple-Cycle extension for up to 7 additional cycles of chemotherapy. The proportion of patients with complete response in the delayed phase by treatment group at each cycle (cycles 2 to 6) is displayed in Figure 1. A limited number of patients received treatment beyond cycle 6. During all cycles the CR rate in the delayed phase was higher for AKYNZEO than for palonosetron. Antiemetic activity of AKYNZEO was maintained throughout repeat cycles for those patients continuing in each of the multiple cycles.

Referenced Image

Figure 1: Proportion of Patients with Complete Response in the Delayed Phase by Treatment Group and Cycle in Study 2

Additional clinical trials (Study 3 and Study 4) were conducted to support the efficacy of AKYNZEO.

Study 3 (NCT01376297 )

In a separate study, 309 patients undergoing initial and repeat cycles of chemotherapy (including carboplatin, cisplatin, oxaliplatin, and doxorubicin regimens) received AKYNZEO; efficacy was maintained throughout all cycles.

Study 4 (NCT01363479 )

In a multicenter, multinational, randomized, active‑controlled, double‑blind, double‑dummy, parallel group, clinical non-inferiority study, the efficacy and safety of a single dose of oral palonosetron 0.5 mg was compared to intravenous palonosetron 0.25 mg in cancer patients scheduled to receive highly emetogenic cisplatin ( > 70 mg/m 2 ) based chemotherapy. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate that oral palonosetron 0.5 mg contributes to the efficacy of AKYNZEO during the acute phase (first 24 hours after cancer chemotherapy) in the setting of cisplatin based chemotherapy. A total of 739 patients (oral palonosetron n=370; intravenous palonosetron n=369) received study medication.

The primary efficacy endpoint was complete response (CR) (defined as no emetic episode and no use of rescue medication) within 24 hours (acute phase) after the start of cisplatin-based chemotherapy administration. In the oral palonosetron arm, 89.4% of patients achieved a CR in the acute phase compared to 86.2% of patients in the intravenous palonosetron arm, with a difference of 3.2% (99% CI: ‑2.7% to 9.2%). Non‑inferiority of oral palonosetron versus intravenous palonosetron was demonstrated since the lower limit of the two‑sided 99% CI for the difference in proportions of patients with CR was greater (i.e., closer to zero) than the pre‑defined non‑inferiority margin set at ‑15%.

Study 5 (NCT02557035 )

In a multicenter, multinational, randomized, active controlled, double blind, double dummy, parallel group, clinical non-inferiority study, the efficacy and safety of a single dose of intravenous palonosetron 0.25 mg administered over 30 minutes (infusion) was compared to intravenous palonosetron 0.25 mg administered over 30 seconds (bolus) in cancer patients scheduled to receive a HEC chemotherapy regimen that included cisplatin administered as a single IV dose of 70 mg/m 2 , cyclophosphamide 1500 mg/m 2 , carmustine (BCNU) >250mg/m 2 , dacarbazine (DTIC) and mechloretamine (nitrogen mustard). The purpose of this study was to demonstrate that intravenous palonosetron 0.25 mg administered over 30 minutes was non-inferior to administration of intravenous palonosetron 0.25 mg administered over 30 seconds for prevention of nausea and vomiting during the acute phase (first 24 hours after cancer chemotherapy) in the HEC setting. A total of 425 patients (intravenous palonosetron infusion n=214; intravenous palonosetron bolus n=211) received study medication and HEC and completed the 0-24 h study period with no major protocol violations and were included in the Per Protocol Population.

The primary efficacy endpoint was complete response (CR defined as no emetic episode and no use of rescue medication) in the 24 hours (acute phase) after the start of the scheduled chemotherapy. In the intravenous palonosetron infusion group, 82.7% of patients achieved CR in the acute phase compared to 86.3% of patients in the intravenous palonosetron bolus group, with a difference of -3.4% (99% CI: - 12.0% to 5.2%). Non-inferiority of administration of intravenous palonosetron over 30 minutes compared to administration of intravenous palonosetron over 30 seconds was demonstrated since the lower limit of the two-sided 99% CI for the difference in proportions of patients with CR was greater (i.e., closer to zero) than the pre-defined non inferiority margin set at -15%.

How Supplied/Storage & Handling
Mechanism of Action
Data SourceWe receive information directly from the FDA and PrescriberPoint is updated as frequently as changes are made available
Interactions Banner
Check medication interactionsReview interactions as part of your prescribing workflow

Akynzeo PubMed™ news

    Show the latest PubMed™ articles for Akynzeo