logo
Sign In
Last Update: December 12, 2025
Prescribing informationPrior authorizationFind savingsPubMed™ newsPatient education
Farxiga vs. GlyxambiBerinert vs. CinryzeEmgality vs. QuliptaFarxiga vs. InvokanaFirazyr vs. SajazirGlyxambi vs. InvokanaInvokamet vs. SynjardyOpzelura vs. DupixentOrencia vs. RinvoqQulipta vs. VyeptiStelara vs. TremfyaSynjardy vs. VictozaTaltz vs. BimzelxVyepti vs. Nurtec ODTView all Comparisons
ADHD drugsAnxiety drugsAsthma drugsAtopic dermatitis drugsDepression drugsHeart failure drugsHypertension drugsLymphoma drugsOsteoarthritis drugsRheumatoid arthritis drugsRosacea drugsSchizophrenia drugsType 2 Diabetes drugsView all Indications
Bayer drugsAbbVie drugsAstraZeneca drugsEli Lilly and Company drugsGenetech drugsGlaxoSmithKline (GSK) drugsNovartis drugsPfizer drugsTakeda Pharmaceuticals drugsTeva Pharmaceuticals drugsAmgen drugsView all Manufacturers
Beta-Adrenergic BlockerAngiotensin Converting Enzyme InhibitorAngiotensin 2 Receptor BlockerCalcium Channel BlockerDiureticsHMG-CoA Reductase InhibitorProton Pump InhibitorSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorNorepinephrine Reuptake InhibitorBenzodiazepinesOpioid AgonistsNonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory DrugsAntiepileptic AgentsAntipsychoticsAntihistaminesView all Classes
Wegovy®Ozempic®Mounjaro®Zepbound®Jardiance®Farxiga®Dupixent®Trulicity®Lyrica®Lipitor®Effexor®Concerta®Depakote®Trintellix®Rexulti®Rinvoq®Verzenio®Taltz®
For ProvidersRequest DemoJoin Research Panel
For BusinessHCP ChannelCommercial O/SEngageMarketplaceOneHubInsight
Tools & MorePrescribing InfoCoverageSavingsPatient ResourcesA-Z IndicationsCompare Drugs
CompanyAboutInsightsCareersContactSecurity
Legit Script Certified
Get the latest insights in your inbox
Follow us
Legit Script Certified
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • © 2025 PrescriberPoint. All Rights Reserved.
  • Diacomit (Stiripentol)

    Check Drug InteractionsCheck known drug interactions.
    Check Drug Interactions
    Find savings
    Get prior authorization forms
    Get patient education materials
    PrescriberAI is currently offline. Try again later.

    By using PrescriberAI, you agree to the AI Terms of Use.

    This AI tool offers medical information for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical judgment or advice. Physicians and healthcare professionals should exercise their expertise and discretion when interpreting and applying the provided information to specific clinical situations.

    Diacomit prescribing information

    DIACOMIT is indicated for the treatment of seizures associated with Dravet syndrome (DS) in patients taking clobazam who are 6 months of age and older and weighing 7 kg or more. There are no clinical data to support the use of DIACOMIT as monotherapy in Dravet syndrome.

    Capsules

    • 250 mg: size 2, pink, and imprinted with “Diacomit” and “250mg”
    • 500 mg: size 0, white, and imprinted with “Diacomit” and “500mg”

    For Oral Suspension

    • Pale pink fruit flavored powder packaged in packets. Each packet contains either 250 mg or 500 mg of stiripentol

    None.

    The following serious or otherwise clinically significant adverse reactions are described elsewhere in the labeling:

    • Somnolence
      [see
      5.1 Somnolence

      DIACOMIT can cause somnolence.  In controlled studies in patients with Dravet syndrome, the incidence of somnolence was 67% in DIACOMIT-treated patients, compared to 23% in patients on placebo. All patients in both groups were on concomitant clobazam, which is also known to cause somnolence. Co-administration of DIACOMIT with clobazam results in increased levels of clobazam and its active metabolite

      [see Drug Interactions (7.1)].
      Other central nervous system CNS depressants, including alcohol, could potentiate the somnolence effect of DIACOMIT.

      Prescribers should monitor patients for somnolence. If somnolence occurs during co-administration with clobazam, consider an initial reduction of clobazam by 25%.  If somnolence persists, further clobazam reduction by an additional 25% should be considered, as should adjustment of the dosage of other concomitant anticonvulsant drugs with sedating properties. Prescribers should caution patients against engaging in hazardous activities requiring mental alertness, such as operating dangerous machinery or motor vehicles, until the effect of DIACOMIT on mental alertness is known.

      ]
    • Decreased Appetite and Decreased Weight
      [see
      5.2 Decreased Appetite and Decreased Weight

      DIACOMIT can cause decreases in appetite and weight. In controlled studies in patients with Dravet syndrome, the incidence of decreased appetite was 46% in DIACOMIT-treated patients, compared to 10% in patients on placebo. The incidence of decreased weight was 27% in DIACOMIT-treated patients, compared to 6% in patients on placebo. Nausea and vomiting also occurred more frequently in DIACOMIT-treated patients

      [see Adverse Reactions (6.1)]
      . Given the frequency of these adverse reactions, the growth of pediatric patients treated with DIACOMIT should be carefully monitored. In some cases, decreasing the dose of concomitant valproate by 30% per week can reduce the decrease in appetite and weight.

      ]
    • Neutropenia and Thrombocytopenia
      [see
      5.3 Neutropenia and Thrombocytopenia

      DIACOMIT can cause a significant decline in neutrophil count. In controlled studies in patients with Dravet syndrome, there were 31 patients treated with DIACOMIT who had both a baseline and end-of-study neutrophil count obtained. A decrease in neutrophil count from normal at baseline to less than 1500 cells/mm3during the trial was observed in 13% of these DIACOMIT- treated patients, but not in any placebo-treated patients.

      DIACOMIT can cause a significant decline in platelet count. In controlled studies in patients with Dravet syndrome, there were 31 patients treated with DIACOMIT who had both a baseline and end-of-study platelet count. A decrease in platelet count from normal at baseline to less than 150,000/µL during the trial was observed in 13% of these DIACOMIT-treated patients, but not in any placebo-treated patients.

      Hematologic testing should be obtained prior to starting treatment with DIACOMIT, and then every 6 months.

      ]
    • Withdrawal Symptoms
      [see
      5.4 Withdrawal Symptoms

      As with most antiepileptic drugs, DIACOMIT should generally be withdrawn gradually to minimize the risk of increased seizure frequency and status epilepticus

      .

      In situations where rapid withdrawal of DIACOMIT is required (e.g., in the setting of a serious adverse reaction), appropriate monitoring is recommended.

      ]
    • Risks in Patients with Phenylketonuria
      [see
      5.6 Suicidal Behavior and Ideation

      AEDs, including DIACOMIT, increase the risk of suicidal thoughts or behavior in patients taking these drugs for any indication. Patients treated with any AED for any indication should be monitored for the emergence or worsening of depression, suicidal thoughts or behavior, and/or any unusual changes in mood or behavior.

      Pooled analyses of 199 placebo-controlled clinical trials (mono- and adjunctive therapy) of 11 different AEDs showed that patients randomized to one of the AEDs had approximately twice the risk (adjusted relative risk 1.8, 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.2, 2.7) of suicidal thinking or behavior compared to patients randomized to placebo. In these trials, which had a median treatment duration of 12 weeks, the estimated incidence rate of suicidal behavior or ideation among 27,863 AED treated patients was 0.43%, compared to 0.24% among 16,029 placebo treated patients, representing an increase of approximately one case of suicidal thinking or behavior for every 530 patients treated. There were four suicides in drug treated patients in the trials and none in placebo treated patients, but the number is too small to allow any conclusion about drug effect on suicide.

      The increased risk of suicidal thoughts or behavior with AEDs was observed as early as one week after starting drug treatment with AEDs and persisted for the duration of treatment assessed. Because most trials included in the analysis did not extend beyond 24 weeks, the risk of suicidal thoughts or behavior beyond 24 weeks could not be assessed.

      The risk of suicidal thoughts or behavior was generally consistent among drugs in the data analyzed. The finding of increased risk with AEDs of varying mechanisms of action and across a range of indications suggests that the risk applies to all AEDs used for any indication. The risk did not vary substantially by age (5-100 years) in the clinical trials analyzed. Table 2 shows absolute and relative risk by indication for all evaluated AEDs.

      Table 2. Risk by Indication for Antiepileptic Drugs in the Pooled Analysis
      IndicationPlacebo Patients

      with Events per

      1000 Patients
      Drug Patients with

      Events per 1000

      Patients
      Relative Risk:

      Incidence of Drug

      Events in Drug

      Patients/Incidence in

      Placebo Patients
      Risk Difference:

      Additional Drug

      Patients with Events

      per 1000 Patients
      Epilepsy1.03.43.52.4
      Psychiatric5.78.51.52.9
      Other1.01.81.90.9
      Total2.44.31.81.9

      The relative risk for suicidal thoughts or behavior was higher in clinical trials for epilepsy than in clinical trials for psychiatric or other conditions, but the absolute risk differences were similar for the epilepsy and psychiatric indications.

      Anyone considering prescribing DIACOMIT or any other AED must balance the risk of suicidal thoughts or behavior with the risk of untreated illness. Epilepsy and many other illnesses for which AEDs are prescribed are themselves associated with morbidity and mortality and an increased risk of suicidal thoughts and behavior. Should suicidal thoughts and behavior emerge during treatment, the prescriber needs to consider whether the emergence of these symptoms in any given patient may be related to the illness being treated.

      Patients, their caregivers, and families should be informed that AEDs increase the risk of suicidal thoughts and behavior and should be advised of the need to be alert for the emergence or worsening of the signs and symptoms of depression, any unusual changes in mood or behavior, or the emergence of suicidal thoughts, behavior, or thoughts about self-harm. Behaviors of concern should be reported immediately to healthcare providers.

      ]
    • Suicidal Behavior and Ideation
      [see
      5.6 Suicidal Behavior and Ideation

      AEDs, including DIACOMIT, increase the risk of suicidal thoughts or behavior in patients taking these drugs for any indication. Patients treated with any AED for any indication should be monitored for the emergence or worsening of depression, suicidal thoughts or behavior, and/or any unusual changes in mood or behavior.

      Pooled analyses of 199 placebo-controlled clinical trials (mono- and adjunctive therapy) of 11 different AEDs showed that patients randomized to one of the AEDs had approximately twice the risk (adjusted relative risk 1.8, 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.2, 2.7) of suicidal thinking or behavior compared to patients randomized to placebo. In these trials, which had a median treatment duration of 12 weeks, the estimated incidence rate of suicidal behavior or ideation among 27,863 AED treated patients was 0.43%, compared to 0.24% among 16,029 placebo treated patients, representing an increase of approximately one case of suicidal thinking or behavior for every 530 patients treated. There were four suicides in drug treated patients in the trials and none in placebo treated patients, but the number is too small to allow any conclusion about drug effect on suicide.

      The increased risk of suicidal thoughts or behavior with AEDs was observed as early as one week after starting drug treatment with AEDs and persisted for the duration of treatment assessed. Because most trials included in the analysis did not extend beyond 24 weeks, the risk of suicidal thoughts or behavior beyond 24 weeks could not be assessed.

      The risk of suicidal thoughts or behavior was generally consistent among drugs in the data analyzed. The finding of increased risk with AEDs of varying mechanisms of action and across a range of indications suggests that the risk applies to all AEDs used for any indication. The risk did not vary substantially by age (5-100 years) in the clinical trials analyzed. Table 2 shows absolute and relative risk by indication for all evaluated AEDs.

      Table 2. Risk by Indication for Antiepileptic Drugs in the Pooled Analysis
      IndicationPlacebo Patients

      with Events per

      1000 Patients
      Drug Patients with

      Events per 1000

      Patients
      Relative Risk:

      Incidence of Drug

      Events in Drug

      Patients/Incidence in

      Placebo Patients
      Risk Difference:

      Additional Drug

      Patients with Events

      per 1000 Patients
      Epilepsy1.03.43.52.4
      Psychiatric5.78.51.52.9
      Other1.01.81.90.9
      Total2.44.31.81.9

      The relative risk for suicidal thoughts or behavior was higher in clinical trials for epilepsy than in clinical trials for psychiatric or other conditions, but the absolute risk differences were similar for the epilepsy and psychiatric indications.

      Anyone considering prescribing DIACOMIT or any other AED must balance the risk of suicidal thoughts or behavior with the risk of untreated illness. Epilepsy and many other illnesses for which AEDs are prescribed are themselves associated with morbidity and mortality and an increased risk of suicidal thoughts and behavior. Should suicidal thoughts and behavior emerge during treatment, the prescriber needs to consider whether the emergence of these symptoms in any given patient may be related to the illness being treated.

      Patients, their caregivers, and families should be informed that AEDs increase the risk of suicidal thoughts and behavior and should be advised of the need to be alert for the emergence or worsening of the signs and symptoms of depression, any unusual changes in mood or behavior, or the emergence of suicidal thoughts, behavior, or thoughts about self-harm. Behaviors of concern should be reported immediately to healthcare providers.

      ]
    Table 4. Description
    Proprietary NameDIACOMIT
    Established NameStiripentol
    Route of AdministrationOral
    Chemical Name4,4-dimethyl-1-[3,4-(methylendioxyphenyl)-1-pentene-3-ol
    Structural FormulaReferenced Image

    Stiripentol is a white to pale yellow crystalline powder with a bitter taste; it is practically insoluble in water (at 25°C), sparingly soluble in chloroform, and soluble in acetone, ethanol, ether, acetonitrile, and dichloromethane. The melting point is approximately 75°C. The pKa is 14.2, and measurement of the partition coefficient (water-octanol) provides a Log P value of 2.94. The molecular formula is C14H18O3 and the molecular weight is 234.3.

    Capsules


    DIACOMIT capsules contain 250 mg (size 2: pink) or 500 mg (size 0: white) of stiripentol. Capsules also contain the following inactive ingredients: erythrosine (250 mg capsule only), gelatin, indigotine (250 mg capsule only), magnesium stearate, povidone, sodium starch glycolate, titanium dioxide.

    For Oral Suspension

    DIACOMIT for oral suspension packets contain 250 mg or 500 mg of stiripentol. DIACOMIT packets also contain the following inactive ingredients: aspartame, carmellose sodium, erythrosine, glucose, hydroxyethylcellulose, povidone, sodium starch glycolate, sorbitol, titanium dioxide, fruit flavor (acacia, Bergamot oil, hypromellose, maltodextrin, sorbitol, and vanillin).

    The effectiveness of DIACOMIT for the treatment of seizures associated with Dravet syndrome was established in 2 multicenter placebo-controlled double-blind randomized studies (Study 1 and Study 2), conducted according to similar protocols. To be enrolled in either study, patients were required to be 3 years to less than 18 years of age, to have Dravet syndrome (ILAE classification of epilepsy, 1989), and to be inadequately controlled on clobazam and valproate, with at least 4 generalized clonic or tonic-clonic seizures per month despite optimized therapy.

    Eligible patients were enrolled in a 1-month baseline period during which they continued to receive their optimized antiepileptic treatment. Following this 1-month baseline, patients were randomly allocated to receive either DIACOMIT (fixed dose of 50 mg/kg/day in divided doses with no dose titration) or placebo, added to their treatment with clobazam and valproate. Duration of double-blind treatment was 2 months. The frequency of generalized clonic or tonic-clonic seizures during the study was recorded by patients and/or their caregivers, using a diary. Although patients with Dravet syndrome have several different types of seizures, only generalized clonic or tonic-clonic seizures were recorded, as other seizure types can be difficult to recognize by patients and/or their caregivers as seizures.

    The primary efficacy endpoint for both studies was the responder rate. A responder was defined as a patient who experienced a greater than 50% decrease in the frequency (per 30 days) of generalized clonic or tonic-clonic seizures during the double-blind treatment period compared to the 4-week baseline period (i.e., placebo run-in). The mean change from baseline in frequency of generalized clonic or tonic clonic seizures was also evaluated.

    In Study 1 (n=41), 21 patients were randomized to DIACOMIT, and 20 patients to placebo. In Study 2 (n=23), 12 patients were randomized to DIACOMIT, and 11 patients to placebo. In both studies, the demographic and baseline clinical characteristics were similar between the treatment groups.

    Table5 summarizes the results of the primary endpoint for DIACOMIT in each study.

    Table 5. Efficacy Results in the Intent-to-Treat Population in Study 1 and Study 2
    a Responder is defined as a patient with a greater than 50% decrease in frequency of generalized tonic-clonic or clonic seizures

    b Fisher Exact Test

    c Frequency of generalized tonic-clonic or clonic seizures during month 2

    d Wilcoxon Test with two-sided t-approximation

    e Nominal p value, as Study 2 was stopped early

    CI=confidence interval; SD=standard deviation.

    Study 1

    N=41

    Study 2

    N=23

    DIACOMIT


    N=21
    Placebo


    N=20
    DIACOMIT


    N=12
    Placebo


    N=11
    Responder Analysis
    a
       No of responders/total

       (Responder Rate)

       [95% CI]
     15/21

    (71%)

    [52% – 91%]
     1/20

    (5%)

    [0.0% – 15%]
     8/12

    (67%)

    [40% – 93%]
     1/11

    (9.1%)

    [0.0%– 26%]
    p-valueb
    <0.00010.0094e
    Percentage Change from Baseline in Seizure Frequency
    c
       n

       Mean ± SD

       Median

       Min – Max
    20

    -69% ± 42%

    -91%

    -100% – 28%
    16

    7.6% ± 38%

    7.4%

    -75% – 65%
    11

    -74% ± 27%

    -81%

    -100% – -33%
    9

    -13% ± 62%

    -27%

    -87% – 140%
    p-valued
    0.00020.0056e

    In both studies, the responder rate (primary efficacy endpoint) was significantly greater for DIACOMIT than for placebo. DIACOMIT was also superior to placebo for the reduction in mean frequency of generalized clonic or tonic-clonic seizures. In Study 1 and Study 2, respectively 43% and 25% of patients reported no generalized clonic or tonic-clonic seizure for the duration of the study.

    Figure 1 displays the percentage of patients by category of percent reduction in tonic-clonic and clonic seizure frequency during month 2 of the treatment period compared to baseline (per 30 days) in Study 1 and Study 2 (pooled).

    Figure 1.: Proportion of Patients by Category of Seizure Response for DIACOMIT and Placebo in Study 1 and Study 2 Pooled, Baseline to 2nd Month of Treatment (per 30 days).

    Referenced Image

    The effectiveness of DIACOMIT for the treatment of seizures associated with Dravet syndrome in patients 6 months of age to less than 3 years of age was extrapolated from the demonstration of effectiveness in patients 3 years to less than 18 years of age in Study 1 and Study 2.

    We receive information directly from the FDA and PrescriberPoint is updated as frequently as changes are made available
    View more
    Report Adverse Event

    Diacomit prior authorization resources

    Most recent Diacomit prior authorization forms

    Learn More

    Most recent state uniform prior authorization forms

    Brand Resources

    Diacomit PubMed™ news

      Diacomit patient education

      Patient toolkit