Epidiolex

  Assessments Prior to Initiating EPIDIOLEX

Because of the risk of hepatocellular injury, obtain serum transaminases (ALT and AST) and total bilirubin levels in all patients prior to starting treatment with EPIDIOLEX [see Warnings and Precautions ].

  Dosing for Seizures Associated with Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome or Dravet Syndrome

•

The starting dosage is 2.5 mg/kg by mouth twice daily (5 mg/kg/day).

•

After one week, the dosage can be increased to a maintenance dosage of 5 mg/kg twice daily (10 mg/kg/day).

•

Patients who are tolerating EPIDIOLEX at 5 mg/kg twice daily and require further reduction of seizures may benefit from a dosage increase up to a maximum recommended maintenance dosage of 10 mg/kg twice daily (20 mg/kg/day), in weekly increments of 2.5 mg/kg twice daily (5 mg/kg/day), as tolerated.  For patients in whom a more rapid titration from 10 mg/kg/day to 20 mg/kg/day is warranted, the dosage may be increased no more frequently than every other day.  Administration of the 20 mg/kg/day dosage resulted in somewhat greater reductions in seizure rates than the recommended maintenance dosage of 10 mg/kg/day, but with an increase in adverse reactions.

  Dosing for Seizures Associated with Tuberous Sclerosis Complex

•

The starting dosage is 2.5 mg/kg by mouth twice daily (5 mg/kg/day).

•

Increase the dose in weekly increments of 2.5 mg/kg twice daily (5 mg/kg/day), as tolerated, to a recommended maintenance dosage of 12.5 mg/kg twice daily (25 mg/kg/day).  For patients in whom a more rapid titration to 25 mg/kg/day is warranted, the dosage may be increased no more frequently than every other day.

•

The effectiveness of doses lower than 12.5 mg/kg twice daily has not been studied in patients with TSC.

  Administration Instructions

Food may affect EPIDIOLEX levels [see Clinical Pharmacology ].  Consistent dosing of EPIDIOLEX with respect to meals is recommended to reduce variability in cannabidiol plasma exposure.

Calibrated measuring devices (1 mL and 5 mL oral syringes) will be provided and are recommended to measure and deliver the prescribed dose accurately [see How Supplied/Storage and Handling ].  A household teaspoon or tablespoon is not an adequate measuring device.

Oral administration is recommended.  When necessary, EPIDIOLEX can be enterally administered via silicone feeding tubes, such as nasogastric or gastrostomy tubes.  The recommended volume for flushing (with room temperature drinking water) after each dose is approximately 5 times the priming volume of the tube.  The flushing volume may need to be modified in patients with fluid restrictions.  Do not use with tubes made of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) or polyurethane and avoid use of silicone nasogastric tubes with short lengths and narrow diameters (e.g., less than 50 cm and less than 5 FR).

Discard any unused EPIDIOLEX remaining 12 weeks after first opening the bottle [see How Supplied/ Storage and Handling ].

  Discontinuation of EPIDIOLEX

When discontinuing EPIDIOLEX, the dose should be decreased gradually.  As with most antiepileptic drugs, abrupt discontinuation should be avoided when possible, to minimize the risk of increased seizure frequency and status epilepticus [see Warnings and Precautions ].  

  Patients with Hepatic Impairment

Dose adjustment is recommended in patients with moderate (Child-Pugh B) hepatic impairment or severe (Child-Pugh C) hepatic impairment [see Warnings and Precautions , Use in Specific Populations , and Clinical Pharmacology ].  It may be necessary to have slower dose titration in patients with moderate or severe hepatic impairment than in patients without hepatic impairment (see Table 1). 

EPIDIOLEX does not require dose adjustment in patients with mild (Child-Pugh A) hepatic impairment.

 Pregnancy

Pregnancy Surveillance Program and Pregnancy Exposure Registry

There are two programs, an EPIDIOLEX pregnancy surveillance program and an antiepileptic drug (AED) pregnancy exposure registry that monitor pregnancy outcomes.  Encourage women who are taking EPIDIOLEX during pregnancy to enroll in both, by calling the toll free numbers or visiting the websites below:

•

EPIDIOLEX Pregnancy Surveillance Program

o

1-855-272-7158

o

https://www.epidiolexpregnancystudy.com

•

North American Antiepileptic Drug (NAAED) Pregnancy Registry

o

1-888-233-2334

o

https://www.aedpregnancyregistry.org/

Risk Summary

There are no adequate data on the developmental risks associated with the use of EPIDIOLEX in pregnant women.  Administration of cannabidiol to pregnant animals produced evidence of developmental toxicity (increased embryofetal mortality in rats and decreased fetal body weights in rabbits; decreased growth, delayed sexual maturation, long-term neurobehavioral changes, and adverse effects on the reproductive system in rat offspring) at maternal plasma exposures similar to (rabbit) or greater than (rat) that in humans at therapeutic doses (see Animal Data).  In the U.S. general population, the estimated background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage in clinically recognized pregnancies is 2–4% and 15–20%, respectively. The background risks of major birth defects and miscarriage for the indicated populations are unknown.

Data

Animal Data

Oral administration of cannabidiol (0, 75, 150, or 250 mg/kg/day) to pregnant rats throughout the period of organogenesis resulted in embryofetal mortality at the highest dose tested.  There were no other drug-related maternal or developmental effects.  The highest no-effect dose for embryofetal toxicity in rats was associated with maternal plasma cannabidiol exposures (AUC) approximately 16 and 9 times that in humans at the recommended human doses (RHD) of 20 and 25 mg/kg/day, respectively.

Oral administration of the major human metabolite of cannabidiol, 7-COOH-CBD (0, 25, 50 or 100 mg/kg/day), to pregnant rats throughout the period of organogenesis resulted in embryofetal malformations and variations at the highest dose tested. There were no other drug-related maternal or developmental effects. The highest no‑effect dose for embryofetal toxicity in rats was associated with maternal plasma 7-COOH-CBD exposures (AUC) approximately 10 times that in humans at the RHDs of 20 and 25 mg/kg/day.

Oral administration of cannabidiol (0, 50, 80, or 125 mg/kg/day) to pregnant rabbits throughout organogenesis resulted in decreased fetal body weights and increased fetal structural variations at the highest dose tested, which was also associated with maternal toxicity.  Maternal plasma cannabidiol exposures at the no-effect level for embryofetal developmental toxicity in rabbits were less than that in humans at the RHDs.

When cannabidiol (75, 150, or 250 mg/kg/day) was orally administered to rats throughout pregnancy and lactation, decreased growth, delayed sexual maturation, neurobehavioral changes (decreased activity), and adverse effects on male reproductive organ development (small testes in adult offspring) and fertility were observed in the offspring at the mid and high dose.  These effects occurred in the absence of maternal toxicity.  The no-effect dose for pre- and post-natal developmental toxicity in rats was associated with maternal plasma cannabidiol exposures approximately 9 and 5 times that in humans at the RHDs of 20 and 25 mg/kg/day, respectively.

Oral administration of 7-COOH-CBD (0, 20, 40, or 75 mg/kg/day) to rats throughout pregnancy and lactation was well tolerated and no adverse effects were observed on maternal animals or subsequent offspring until adulthood. The no-effect dose for pre- and post-natal developmental toxicity in rats was associated with maternal plasma 7-COOH-CBD exposure approximately 15 or 16 times that in humans at the RHDs of 20 or 25 mg/kg/day, respectively.

 Lactation

Risk Summary

There are no data on the presence of cannabidiol or its metabolites in human milk, the effects on the breastfed infant, or the effects on milk production.  The developmental and health benefits of breastfeeding should be considered along with the mother’s clinical need for EPIDIOLEX and any potential adverse effects on the breastfed infant from EPIDIOLEX or from the underlying maternal condition.

 Pediatric Use

Safety and effectiveness of EPIDIOLEX for the treatment of seizures associated with LGS, DS, or TSC have been established in patients 1 year of age and older.  The use of EPIDIOLEX in these indications is supported by adequate and well-controlled studies in patients 2 years of age and older with LGS and DS and in patients 1 year of age and older with TSC [see Clinical Studies ].

Safety and effectiveness of EPIDIOLEX in pediatric patients below 1 year of age have not been established.

Juvenile Animal Data

Administration of cannabidiol (subcutaneous doses of 0 or 15 mg/kg on Postnatal Days (PNDs) 4-6 followed by oral administration of 0, 100, 150, or 250 mg/kg on PNDs 7-77) to juvenile rats for 10 weeks resulted in increased body weight, delayed male sexual maturation, neurobehavioral effects (decreased locomotor activity and auditory startle habituation), increased bone mineral density, and liver hepatocyte vacuolation.  A no-effect dose was not established.  The lowest dose causing developmental toxicity in juvenile rats (15 sc/100 po mg/kg) was associated with cannabidiol exposures (AUC) approximately 15 and 8 times that in humans at the RHDs of 20 and 25 mg/kg/day, respectively.

 Geriatric Use

Clinical trials of EPIDIOLEX in the treatment of LGS, DS, and TSC did not include a sufficient number of patients aged above 55 years to determine whether or not they respond differently from younger patients.  In general, dose selection for an elderly patient should be cautious, usually starting at the low end of the dosing range, reflecting the greater frequency of decreased hepatic, renal, or cardiac function, and of concomitant disease or other drug therapy [see Dosage and Administration , Warnings and Precautions , and Clinical Pharmacology ].

  Hepatic Impairment

Because of an increase in exposure to EPIDIOLEX, dosage adjustments are necessary in patients with moderate or severe hepatic impairment [see Dosage and Administration , Warnings and Precautions , and Clinical Pharmacology ].  EPIDIOLEX does not require dosage adjustments in patients with mild hepatic impairment.

  Hepatic Injury 

EPIDIOLEX can cause dose-related elevations of liver transaminases (alanine aminotransferase [ALT] and/or aspartate aminotransferase [AST]).  In controlled studies for LGS and DS (10 and 20 mg/kg/day dosages) and TSC (25 mg/kg/day), the incidence of ALT elevations above 3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) was 13% (10 and 20 mg/kg/day dosages) and 12% (25 mg/kg/day dosage) in EPIDIOLEX-treated patients compared with 1% in patients on placebo.  Less than 1% of EPIDIOLEX-treated patients had ALT or AST levels greater than 20 times the ULN.  There were cases of transaminase elevations associated with hospitalization in patients taking EPIDIOLEX.  In clinical trials, serum transaminase elevations typically occurred in the first two months of treatment initiation; however, there were some cases observed up to 18 months after initiation of treatment, particularly in patients taking concomitant valproate.  Resolution of transaminase elevations occurred with discontinuation of EPIDIOLEX or reduction of EPIDIOLEX and/or concomitant valproate in about two-thirds of the cases.  In about one-third of the cases, transaminase elevations resolved during continued treatment with EPIDIOLEX, without dose reduction.

In the postmarketing setting, cases of cholestatic or mixed patterns of liver injury (i.e., based on calculated ratio of [ALT/ULN]/[ALP/ULN] less than 2 and between 2-5, respectively) were reported in patients treated with EPIDIOLEX.

Risk Factors for Transaminase Elevation

Concomitant Valproate and Clobazam

The majority of ALT elevations in the controlled studies occurred in patients taking concomitant valproate [see Drug Interactions ].  Concomitant use of clobazam also increased the incidence of transaminase elevations, although to a lesser extent than valproate [see Drug Interactions ].  In EPIDIOLEX-treated patients with LGS or DS (10 and 20 mg/kg/day dosages), the incidence of ALT elevations greater than 3 times the ULN was 30% in patients taking both concomitant valproate and clobazam, 21% in patients taking concomitant valproate (without clobazam), 4% in patients taking concomitant clobazam (without valproate), and 3% in patients taking neither drug.  In EPIDIOLEX-treated patients with TSC (25 mg/kg/day), the incidence of ALT elevations greater than 3 times the ULN was 20% in patients taking both concomitant valproate and clobazam, 25% in patients taking concomitant valproate (without clobazam), 0% in patients taking concomitant clobazam (without valproate), and 6% in patients taking neither drug. 

Consider discontinuation or dose adjustment of valproate or clobazam if liver enzyme elevations occur.

In the postmarketing setting, cases of elevated ammonia levels were reported in some EPIDIOLEX-treated patients who also had transaminase elevations; where data were available, most cases reported concomitant use of valproate, clobazam, or both. Consider discontinuation or dose adjustment of valproate or clobazam if ammonia level elevations occur.

Dose

Transaminase elevations are generally dose-related.  In patients with DS or LGS (10 and 20 mg/kg/day) or TSC (25 mg/kg/day), ALT elevations greater than 3 times the ULN were reported in 17% and 12% of patients taking EPIDIOLEX 20 or 25 mg/kg/day, respectively, compared with 1% in patients taking EPIDIOLEX 10 mg/kg/day.  The risk of ALT elevations was higher (25%) in patients with TSC receiving a dosage above the recommended maintenance dosage of 25 mg/kg/day in Study 4.

Baseline Transaminase Elevations

Patients with baseline transaminase levels above the ULN had higher rates of transaminase elevations when taking EPIDIOLEX.  In the DS and LGS controlled trials (Studies 1, 2, and 3) in patients taking EPIDIOLEX 20 mg/kg/day, the frequency of treatment-emergent ALT elevations greater than 3 times the ULN was 30% when ALT was above the ULN at baseline, compared to 12% when ALT was within the normal range at baseline.  No patients taking EPIDIOLEX 10 mg/kg/day experienced ALT elevations greater than 3 times the ULN when ALT was above the ULN at baseline, compared with 2% of patients in whom ALT was within the normal range at baseline.  In the TSC controlled trial (Study 4) in patients taking EPIDIOLEX 25 mg/kg/day, the frequency of treatment-emergent ALT elevations greater than 3 and 5 times the ULN were both 11% when ALT was above the ULN at baseline, compared to 12% and 6%, respectively, when ALT was within the normal range at baseline.

Monitoring

In general, transaminase elevations of greater than 3 times the ULN in the presence of elevated bilirubin without an alternative explanation are an important predictor of severe liver injury. Early identification of elevated liver enzymes may decrease the risk of a serious outcome. Patients with elevated baseline transaminase levels above 3 times the ULN, accompanied by elevations in bilirubin above 2 times the ULN, should be evaluated prior to initiation of EPIDIOLEX treatment.

Prior to starting treatment with EPIDIOLEX, obtain serum transaminases (ALT and AST) and total bilirubin levels.  Serum transaminases and total bilirubin levels should be obtained at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after initiation of treatment with EPIDIOLEX, and periodically thereafter or as clinically indicated.  Serum transaminases and total bilirubin levels should also be obtained within 1 month following changes in EPIDIOLEX dosage and addition of or changes in medications that are known to impact the liver.  Consider more frequent monitoring of serum transaminases and bilirubin in patients who are taking valproate or who have elevated liver enzymes at baseline.

If a patient develops clinical signs or symptoms suggestive of hepatic dysfunction (e.g., unexplained nausea, vomiting, right upper quadrant abdominal pain, fatigue, anorexia, or jaundice and/or dark urine), promptly measure serum transaminases and total bilirubin and interrupt or discontinue treatment with EPIDIOLEX, as appropriate.  Discontinue EPIDIOLEX in any patients with elevations of transaminase levels greater than 3 times the ULN and bilirubin levels greater than 2 times the ULN. Patients with sustained transaminase elevations of greater than 5 times the ULN should also have treatment discontinued. Patients with prolonged elevations of serum transaminases should be evaluated for other possible causes.  Consider dosage adjustment of any coadministered medication that is known to affect the liver (e.g., valproate and clobazam).

  Somnolence and Sedation 

EPIDIOLEX can cause somnolence and sedation.  In controlled studies for LGS and DS (10 and 20 mg/kg/day dosages), the incidence of somnolence and sedation (including lethargy) was 32% in EPIDIOLEX-treated patients (27% and 34% of patients taking EPIDIOLEX 10 or 20 mg/kg/day, respectively), compared with 11% in patients on placebo and was generally dose-related.  The rate was higher in patients on concomitant clobazam (46% in EPIDIOLEX-treated patients taking clobazam compared with 16% in EPIDIOLEX-treated patients not on clobazam).  In the controlled study for TSC, the incidence of somnolence and sedation (including lethargy) was 19% in EPIDIOLEX-treated patients (25 mg/kg/day), compared with 17% in patients on placebo. The rate was higher in patients on concomitant clobazam (33% in EPIDIOLEX-treated patients taking clobazam compared with 14% in EPIDIOLEX-treated patients not on clobazam).  In general, these effects were more common early in treatment and may diminish with continued treatment.  Other CNS depressants, including alcohol, could potentiate the somnolence and sedation effect of EPIDIOLEX.  Prescribers should monitor patients for somnolence and sedation and should advise patients not to drive or operate machinery until they have gained sufficient experience on EPIDIOLEX to gauge whether it adversely affects their ability to drive or operate machinery.

  Suicidal Behavior and Ideation

Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), including EPIDIOLEX, increase the risk of suicidal thoughts or behavior in patients taking these drugs for any indication. Patients treated with an AED for any indication should be monitored for the emergence or worsening of depression, suicidal thoughts or behavior, or any unusual changes in mood or behavior.

Pooled analyses of 199 placebo-controlled clinical trials (mono- and adjunctive therapy) of 11 different AEDs showed that patients randomized to one of the AEDs had approximately twice the risk (adjusted Relative Risk 1.8, 95% CI:1.2, 2.7) of suicidal thinking or behavior compared to patients randomized to placebo. In these trials, which had a median treatment duration of 12 weeks, the estimated incidence rate of suicidal behavior or ideation among 27863 AED-treated patients was 0.43%, compared to 0.24% among 16029 placebo-treated patients, representing an increase of approximately one case of suicidal thinking or behavior for every 530 patients treated. There were four suicides in drug-treated patients in the trials and none in placebo-treated patients, but the number is too small to allow any conclusion about drug effect on suicide.

The increased risk of suicidal thoughts or behavior with AEDs was observed as early as 1 week after starting drug treatment with AEDs and persisted for the duration of treatment assessed. Because most trials included in the analysis did not extend beyond 24 weeks, the risk of suicidal thoughts or behavior beyond 24 weeks could not be assessed.

The risk of suicidal thoughts or behavior was generally consistent among drugs in the data analyzed. The finding of increased risk with AEDs of varying mechanisms of action and across a range of indications suggests that the risk applies to all AEDs used for any indication. The risk did not vary substantially by age (5-100 years) in the clinical trials analyzed. Table 2 shows absolute and relative risk by indication for all evaluated AEDs.

The relative risk for suicidal thoughts or behavior was higher in clinical trials in patients with epilepsy than in clinical trials in patients with psychiatric or other conditions, but the absolute risk differences were similar for the epilepsy and psychiatric indications.

Anyone considering prescribing EPIDIOLEX or any other AED must balance the risk of suicidal thoughts or behaviors with the risk of untreated illness. Epilepsy and many other illnesses for which AEDs are prescribed are themselves associated with morbidity and mortality and an increased risk of suicidal thoughts and behavior. Should suicidal thoughts and behavior emerge during treatment, consider whether the emergence of these symptoms in any given patient may be related to the illness being treated.

  Hypersensitivity Reactions

EPIDIOLEX can cause hypersensitivity reactions.  Some subjects in the EPIDIOLEX clinical trials had pruritus, erythema, and angioedema requiring treatment, including corticosteroids and antihistamines.  Patients with known or suspected hypersensitivity to any ingredients of EPIDIOLEX were excluded from the clinical trials.  If a patient develops hypersensitivity reactions after treatment with EPIDIOLEX, the drug should be discontinued.  EPIDIOLEX is contraindicated in patients with a prior hypersensitivity reaction to cannabidiol or any of the ingredients in the product, which includes sesame seed oil [see Description ].

  Withdrawal of Antiepileptic Drugs (AEDs)

As with most antiepileptic drugs, EPIDIOLEX should generally be withdrawn gradually because of the risk of increased seizure frequency and status epilepticus [see Dosage and Administration  and Clinical Studies ].  But if withdrawal is needed because of a serious adverse event, rapid discontinuation can be considered.  

 Clinical Trials Experience

Because clinical trials are conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reaction rates observed in the clinical trials of a drug cannot be directly compared to rates in the clinical trials of another drug and may not reflect the rates observed in practice.

In controlled and uncontrolled trials in patients with LGS and DS, 689 patients were treated with EPIDIOLEX, including 533 patients treated for more than 6 months, and 391 patients treated for more than 1 year.  In controlled and uncontrolled trials in patients with TSC, 223 patients were treated with EPIDIOLEX, including 151 patients treated for more than 6 months, 88 patients treated for more than 1 year, and 15 patients treated for more than 2 years.

In an expanded access program and other compassionate use programs, 271 patients with DS, LGS, or TSC were treated with EPIDIOLEX, including 237 patients treated for more than 6 months, 204 patients treated for more than 1 year, and 140 patients treated for more than 2 years.

Patients with LGS or DS

In placebo-controlled trials of patients with LGS or DS (includes Studies 1, 2, 3, and a Phase 2 controlled study in DS), 323 patients received EPIDIOLEX [see Clinical Studies ]. Adverse reactions are presented below; the duration of treatment in these trials was up to 14 weeks. Approximately 46% of patients were female, 83% were Caucasian, and the mean age was 14 years (range 2 to 48 years). All patients were taking other AEDs.  

In controlled trials in LGS or DS, the rate of discontinuation as a result of any adverse reaction was 2.7% for patients taking EPIDIOLEX 10 mg/kg/day, 11.8% for patients taking EPIDIOLEX 20 mg/kg/day, and 1.3% for patients on placebo.  The most frequent cause of discontinuations was transaminase elevation.  Discontinuation for transaminase elevation occurred at an incidence of 1.3% in patients taking EPIDIOLEX 10 mg/kg/day, 5.9% in patients taking EPIDIOLEX 20 mg/kg/day, and 0.4% in patients on placebo. Somnolence, sedation, and lethargy led to discontinuation in 3% of patients taking EPIDIOLEX 20 mg/kg/day compared to 0% of patients taking EPIDIOLEX 10 mg/kg/day or on placebo.   

The most common adverse reactions that occurred in EPIDIOLEX-treated patients with LGS or DS (incidence at least 10% and greater than placebo) were somnolence; decreased appetite; diarrhea; transaminase elevations; fatigue, malaise, and asthenia; rash; insomnia, sleep disorder, and poor quality sleep; and infections.

Table 3 lists the adverse reactions that were reported in at least 3% of EPIDIOLEX-treated patients, and at a rate greater than those on placebo, in the placebo-controlled trials in LGS and DS.

Adverse reactions were similar across LGS and DS in pediatric and adult patients.

Patients with TSC

In a placebo-controlled trial of patients with TSC (Study 4), 148 patients received EPIDIOLEX  [see Clinical Studies ].  Adverse reactions are presented below; the duration of treatment in this trial was up to 16 weeks.  Approximately 42% of patients were female, 90% were Caucasian, and the mean age was 14 years (range 1 to 57 years).  All patients but one (25 mg/kg/day group) were taking other AEDs.

In the controlled trial in TSC, the rate of discontinuation as a result of any adverse reaction was 11% for patients taking EPIDIOLEX 25 mg/kg/day and 3% for patients on placebo.  The most frequent cause of discontinuation was rash (5%).

The most common adverse reactions that occurred in EPIDIOLEX-treated patients with TSC (incidence at least 10% at the recommended dosage and greater than placebo) were diarrhea; transaminase elevations; decreased appetite; somnolence; pyrexia; and vomiting.

Table 4 lists the adverse reactions that were reported in at least 3% of EPIDIOLEX-treated patients, and at a rate greater than those on placebo, in the placebo-controlled trial in TSC.

Adverse reactions were similar in pediatric and adult patients with TSC.

Additional Adverse Reactions in Patients with LGS, DS, or TSC

Decreased Weight

EPIDIOLEX can cause weight loss.  In the controlled trials of patients with LGS or DS (10 and 20 mg/kg/day), based on measured weights, 16% of EPIDIOLEX-treated patients had a decrease in weight of at least 5% from their baseline weight, compared to 8% of patients on placebo. The decrease in weight appeared to be dose-related, with 18% of patients on EPIDIOLEX 20 mg/kg/day experiencing a decrease in weight at least 5%, compared to 9% in patients on EPIDIOLEX 10 mg/kg/day. In the controlled trial of patients with TSC (25 mg/kg/day), 31% of EPIDIOLEX-treated patients had a decrease in weight of at least 5% from their baseline weight, compared to 8% of patients on placebo. In some cases, the decreased weight was reported as an adverse event (see Tables 3 and 4).

Hematologic Abnormalities

EPIDIOLEX can cause decreases in hemoglobin and hematocrit.  In controlled trials of patients with LGS or DS, the mean decrease in hemoglobin from baseline to end of treatment was -0.42 g/dL in EPIDIOLEX-treated patients receiving 10 or 20 mg/kg/day and -0.03 g/dL in patients on placebo.  A corresponding decrease in hematocrit was also observed, with a mean change of -1.5% in EPIDIOLEX-treated patients, and -0.4% in patients on placebo.  In the trial of patients with TSC, the mean decrease in hemoglobin from baseline to end of treatment was -0.37 g/dL in EPIDIOLEX-treated patients receiving 25 mg/kg/day and 0.07 g/dL in patients on placebo.  A corresponding decrease in hematocrit was also observed, with a mean change of -1.2% in EPIDIOLEX-treated patients, and -0.2% in patients on placebo.

There was no effect on red blood cell indices.  Thirty percent (30%) of EPIDIOLEX-treated patients with LGS and DS and 38% of EPIDIOLEX-treated patients with TSC developed a new laboratory-defined anemia during the course of the study (defined as a normal hemoglobin concentration at baseline, with a reported value less than the lower limit of normal at a subsequent time point), versus 13% of patients with LGS and DS on placebo and 15% of patients with TSC on placebo.

Increases in Creatinine

EPIDIOLEX can cause elevations in serum creatinine.  The mechanism has not yet been determined.  In controlled studies in healthy adults and in patients with LGS, DS, and TSC, an increase in serum creatinine of approximately 10% was observed within 2 weeks of starting EPIDIOLEX.  The increase was reversible in healthy adults.  Reversibility was not assessed in studies in LGS, DS, or TSC.

Increases in Pneumonia with Concomitant Clobazam

Pneumonia has been observed in controlled trials in patients with LGS and DS more frequently with clobazam (7 of 41 [17%] in patients receiving 10 mg/kg/day EPIDIOLEX, 13 of 125 [10%] in patients receiving 20 mg/kg/day EPIDIOLEX, and 1 of 123 [1%] receiving placebo) than without concomitant clobazam (0% in patients receiving 10 mg/kg/day EPIDIOLEX, 4 of 113 [4%] in patients receiving 20 mg/kg/day EPIDIOLEX, and 1 of 104 [1%] receiving placebo).  In the controlled trial in patients with TSC, pneumonia was observed more frequently with concomitant clobazam (3 of 18 [17%] in patients receiving 25 mg/kg/day EPIDIOLEX and 0 of 25 [0%] receiving placebo) than without clobazam (0 of 57 [0%] in patients receiving 25 mg/kg/day EPIDIOLEX and 1 of 51 [2%] receiving placebo).

  Effect of Other Drugs on EPIDIOLEX

Strong CYP3A4 or CYP2C19 Inducers

Coadministration with a strong CYP3A4 and CYP2C19 inducer (rifampin 600 mg once daily) decreased cannabidiol and 7-OH-CBD plasma concentrations by approximately 32% and 63%.  The impact of such changes on efficacy of EPIDIOLEX is not known [see Clinical Pharmacology ].  Consider an increase in EPIDIOLEX dosage (based on clinical response and tolerability) up to 2-fold, when coadministered with a strong CYP3A4 and/or CYP2C19 inducer.

  Effect of EPIDIOLEX on Other Drugs

UGT1A9, UGT2B7, CYP1A2, CYP2B6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, and CYP2C19 Substrates

Cannabidiol is a weak inhibitor of CYP1A2 [see Clinical Pharmacology ].  Increases in exposure of sensitive CYP1A2 substrates (e.g., caffeine, theophylline, or tizanidine) may be observed when coadministered with cannabidiol.

In vitro data predict drug-drug interactions with CYP2B6 substrates (e.g., bupropion, efavirenz), uridine 5'-diphospho-glucuronosyltransferase 1A9 (UGT1A9) substrates (e.g., diflunisal, propofol, fenofibrate), and UGT2B7 substrates (e.g., gemfibrozil, lamotrigine, morphine, lorazepam) when coadministered with EPIDIOLEX.  Coadministration of EPIDIOLEX is also predicted to cause clinically significant interactions with CYP2C8 and CYP2C9 (e.g., phenytoin) substrates.  Because of potential inhibition of enzyme activity, consider a reduction in dosage of substrates of UGT1A9, UGT2B7, CYP1A2, CYP2C8, and CYP2C9, as clinically appropriate, if adverse reactions are experienced when administered concomitantly with EPIDIOLEX.  Because of the potential for both induction and inhibition of enzyme activity, consider adjusting dosage of substrates of CYP2B6, as clinically appropriate.

Sensitive CYP2C19 Substrates

In vivo data show that coadministration of EPIDIOLEX increases plasma concentrations of drugs that are metabolized by (i.e., are substrates of) CYP2C19 (e.g., diazepam) and may increase the risk of adverse reactions with these substrates [see Clinical Pharmacology ]. Consider a reduction in dosage of sensitive CYP2C19 substrates, as clinically appropriate, when coadministered with EPIDIOLEX.

Clobazam

Coadministration of EPIDIOLEX produces a 3-fold increase in plasma concentrations of N-desmethylclobazam, the active metabolite of clobazam (a substrate of CYP2C19), with no effect on clobazam levels [see Clinical Pharmacology ].  The increase in N-desmethylclobazam may increase the risk of clobazam-related adverse reactions [see Adverse Reactions and Warnings and Precautions ].  Consider a reduction in dosage of clobazam if adverse reactions known to occur with clobazam are experienced when coadministered with EPIDIOLEX.

Stiripentol

Concomitant use of EPIDIOLEX and stiripentol causes an elevation in exposure to stiripentol [see Clinical Pharmacology ].  The mechanism of this interaction has not been determined.  The clinical relevance of this effect is unknown, but patients should be monitored for stiripentol-related adverse drug reactions.

Sensitive P-gp Substrates Given Orally

Coadministration of EPIDIOLEX with orally administered everolimus, a P-gp and CYP3A4 substrate, results in an approximately 2.5-fold increase in mean Cmax and AUC of everolimus [see Clinical Pharmacology ].  When initiating EPIDIOLEX in patients taking everolimus, monitor therapeutic drug levels of everolimus and adjust the dosage accordingly.  When initiating everolimus in patients taking a stable dosage of EPIDIOLEX, a lower starting dose of everolimus is recommended, with therapeutic drug monitoring.

Increases in exposure of other orally administered P-gp substrates (e.g., sirolimus, tacrolimus, digoxin) may be observed on coadministration with EPIDIOLEX.  Therapeutic drug monitoring and dose reduction of other P-gp substrates should be considered when given orally and concurrently with EPIDIOLEX.

  Concomitant Use of EPIDIOLEX and Valproate

Concomitant use of EPIDIOLEX and valproate increases the incidence of liver enzyme elevations [see Warnings and Precautions ].  If such elevations occur, discontinuation or reduction of EPIDIOLEX and/or concomitant valproate should be considered.  Insufficient data are available to assess the risk of concomitant administration of other hepatotoxic drugs and EPIDIOLEX.

  CNS Depressants and Alcohol

Concomitant use of EPIDIOLEX with other CNS depressants (including alcohol) may increase the risk of sedation and somnolence [see Warnings and Precautions ].

 Mechanism of Action

The precise mechanisms by which EPIDIOLEX exerts its anticonvulsant effect in humans are unknown.  Cannabidiol does not appear to exert its anticonvulsant effects through interaction with cannabinoid receptors.

  Pharmacodynamics

Cardiac Electrophysiology

Concentration-dependent QTc prolongation was observed for EPIDIOLEX. At exposures obtained when administered as monotherapy at recommended doses with a high fat meal, EPIDIOLEX did not prolong the QTc interval greater than 10 msec.

Other factors such as food intake, certain concomitant medications (e.g., clobazam), and alcohol consumption may increase the exposure of EPIDIOLEX and the potential effect on QTc prolongation in this scenario is not known.

 Pharmacokinetics

Cannabidiol demonstrated an increase in exposure that was less than dose-proportional over the range of 5 to 25 mg/kg/day in patients.

Absorption

Cannabidiol has a time to maximum plasma concentration (Tmax) of 2.5 to 5 hours at steady state (Css). 

Effect of Food

Coadministration of EPIDIOLEX (750 or 1500 mg) with a high-fat/high-calorie meal increased Cmax by 5‑fold, AUC by 4‑fold, and reduced the total variability, compared with the fasted state in healthy volunteers [see Dosage and Administration ].  Coadministration of EPIDIOLEX with a low-fat/low-calorie meal increased Cmax and AUC by 4-fold and 3-fold, respectively.  Furthermore, coadministration of EPIDIOLEX with bovine milk increased exposure by approximately 3-fold for Cmax and 2.5‑fold for AUC.  Coadministration of EPIDIOLEX with alcohol also caused increased exposure to cannabidiol, with 93% increased Cmax and 63% greater AUC.

Distribution

The apparent volume of distribution in healthy volunteers was 20963 L to 42849 L.  Protein binding of the cannabidiol and its metabolites was > 94% in vitro.  

Elimination

The half-life of cannabidiol in plasma was 56 to 61 hours after twice-daily dosing for 7 days in healthy volunteers.  The plasma clearance of cannabidiol following a single EPIDIOLEX 1500 mg dose (approximately equal to the 20 mg/kg/day dosage) is 1111 L/h.

Metabolism

Cannabidiol is metabolized in the liver and the gut (primarily in the liver) by CYP2C19 and CYP3A4 enzymes, and UGT1A7, UGT1A9, and UGT2B7 isoforms.

After repeat dosing, the active metabolite of cannabidiol, 7-OH-CBD, has a 38% lower AUC than the parent drug.  The 7-OH-CBD metabolite is converted to 7‑COOH-CBD, which has an approximately 40‑fold higher AUC than the parent drug.  Based on preclinical models of seizure, the 7-OH-CBD metabolite is active; however, the activity of the 7‑COOH-CBD metabolite is inconclusive.

Excretion

EPIDIOLEX is excreted in feces, with minor renal clearance.

Specific Populations

Patients with Hepatic Impairment

No effects on the exposures of cannabidiol or metabolite exposures were observed following administration of a single dose of EPIDIOLEX 200 mg in patients with mild (Child-Pugh A) hepatic impairment.  Patients with moderate (Child-Pugh B) or severe (Child-Pugh C) hepatic impairment had an approximately 2.5 to 5.2-fold higher AUC, compared with healthy volunteers with normal hepatic function [see Dosage and Administration , Warnings and Precautions , and Use in Specific Populations ].

Drug Interaction Studies

In Vitro Assessment of Drug Interactions

Drug Metabolizing Enzymes [see Drug Interactions ( 7.1, 7.2)]

Cannabidiol is a substrate for CYP3A4 and CYP2C19.  Cannabidiol has the potential to inhibit CYP1A2, CYP2B6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, and CYP2C19 at clinically relevant concentrations. 

Cannabidiol may induce or inhibit CYP2B6 at clinically relevant concentrations.

Cannabidiol inhibits uridine 5'-diphospho-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) enzymes UGT1A9 and UGT2B7, but does not inhibit the UGT1A1, UGT1A3, UGT1A4, UGT1A6, or UGT2B17 isoforms.

Transporters

Cannabidiol and the cannabidiol metabolite, 7-OH-CBD, are not anticipated to interact with BCRP, BSEP, MDR1/P-gp, OAT1, OAT3, OCT1, OCT2, MATE1, MATE2-K, OATP1B1, or OATP1B3. However, due to limitations of the in vitro testing procedure, inhibition of P-gp mediated efflux by cannabidiol in the intestine could not be excluded.  In vivo data show that CBD can affect P-gp efflux activity in the intestine [see In Vivo Assessment of Drug Interactions].

The cannabidiol metabolite, 7-COOH-CBD, is not a substrate of BCRP, OATP1B1, OATP1B3, or OCT1. However, 7-COOH-CBD is a substrate for P-gp. 7-COOH-CBD is an inhibitor of transport mediated via BCRP and BSEP at clinically relevant concentrations.

In Vivo Assessment of Drug Interactions

Drug Interaction Studies with AEDs

Clobazam and Valproate

The interaction potential with other AEDs (clobazam and valproate) was evaluated in dedicated clinical studies following coadministration of EPIDIOLEX (750 mg twice daily in healthy volunteers and 20 mg/kg/day in patients).  

Coadministration with clobazam in healthy volunteers increased the cannabidiol active metabolite 7-OH-CBD mean Cmax by 73% and AUC by 47%; and increased the clobazam active metabolite, N-desmethylclobazam, Cmax and AUC by approximately 3-fold, with no effect on clobazam levels [see Drug Interactions ].

When EPIDIOLEX was coadministered with valproate in a healthy-volunteer trial, there was no effect on the systemic exposure to valproate.  In a separate study in epilepsy patients investigating the effect of EPIDIOLEX on valproate exposure, there were decreases in both the plasma Cmax and AUC of valproate, which were not clinically relevant (approximately 17% and 21%, respectively), and a decrease in exposure of the putative hepatotoxic metabolite of valproate, 2-propyl-4-pentanoic acid (approximately 28% and 33%, respectively).

In the healthy-volunteer trial, coadministration with valproate resulted in no clinically relevant changes in exposure to cannabidiol or its major metabolites (cannabidiol Cmax decreased by 26%; 6-OH-CBD AUC increased by 27%; 7-OH-CBD AUC increased by 22%; 7-COOH-CBD Cmax and AUC increased by 25% and 32%, respectively).

Effect of EPIDIOLEX on Midazolam

Coadministration of EPIDIOLEX with midazolam (a sensitive CYP3A4 substrate) did not result in changes in plasma concentrations of midazolam compared to midazolam administered alone.

Effect of EPIDIOLEX on Stiripentol

When EPIDIOLEX was coadministered with stiripentol in a healthy volunteer trial, Cmax and AUC of stiripentol increased 28% and 55%, respectively.  In patients with epilepsy, Cmax and AUC of stiripentol increased 17% and 30%, respectively [see Drug Interactions ].

Effect of EPIDIOLEX on Caffeine

In vivo data from steady-state dosing with cannabidiol (750 mg twice daily) when coadministered with a single dose of caffeine (200 mg), a sensitive CYP1A2 substrate, showed increased caffeine exposure by 15% for Cmax and 95% for AUC compared to when caffeine was administered alone [see Drug Interactions ].

Effect of CYP3A4 and CYP2C19 Inducers and Inhibitors Coadministered with EPIDIOLEX on Exposure to Cannabidiol

Coadministration of EPIDIOLEX with potent inhibitors of CYP3A4 and CYP2C19 had the following effects on exposure to cannabidiol and its metabolites.  The potent CYP3A4 inhibitor, itraconazole, increased exposure by < 10% for cannabidiol and < 20% for 7-OH-CBD and 7-COOH-CBD for both AUC and Cmax.  Although the effects of the potent CYP2C19 inhibitor fluconazole were slightly more marked, they are still considered not to be clinically meaningful (cannabidiol increased by 22% and 24% for AUC and Cmax, respectively; 7-OH-CBD decreased by 28% and 41% for AUC and Cmax; 7-COOH-CBD decreased by 33% and 48% for AUC and Cmax).

Coadministration with the potent CYP3A4 and CYP2C19 inducing agent rifampin caused a decrease in cannabidiol exposure of 32% and 34% for AUC and Cmax [see Drug Interactions ].  There were moderate changes in exposure to the active metabolite (7-OH-CBD decreased by 63% and 67% for AUC and Cmax, 7‑COOH‑CBD decreased by 48% for AUC, whereas there was no change in Cmax).

Effect of EPIDIOLEX on Everolimus

Coadministration of EPIDIOLEX (12.5 mg/kg twice daily) with the P-gp and CYP3A4 substrate everolimus (5 mg) in healthy volunteers led to an approximately 2.5-fold increase in everolimus mean Cmax and AUC [see Drug Interactions ].

 Carcinogenesis and Mutagenesis

Carcinogenesis

In a carcinogenicity study in mice, oral administration of cannabidiol (0 [water], 0 [vehicle], 30, 100, or 300 mg/kg/day) for 2 years resulted in an increased incidence of hepatocellular adenomas in male mice at the highest dose tested.  At the mid dose (100 mg/kg/day), plasma exposures (AUC) were approximately 5 and 3 times that at the recommended human doses (RHDs) of 20 and 25 mg/kg/day, respectively.

The carcinogenic potential of cannabidiol has not been assessed in rats.

Mutagenesis

Cannabidiol was negative for genotoxicity in in vitro (Ames) and in vivo (rat Comet and bone marrow micronucleus) assays. The cannabidiol metabolites, 7-OH-CBD and 7-COOH-CBD, were negative for genotoxicity in vitro (Ames) and 7-COOH-CBD was negative for genotoxicity in vivo (rat Comet and bone marrow micronucleus) assays. Furthermore, 7-OH-CBD was negative for genotoxicity in vitro (human lymphocyte chromosome aberration assay).

Impairment of Fertility

Oral administration of cannabidiol (0, 75, 150, or 250 mg/kg/day) to male and female rats, prior to and throughout mating and continuing in females during early gestation, produced no adverse effects on fertility.  The highest dose tested was associated with plasma exposures (AUC) approximately 60 and 34 times that in humans at the RHDs of 20 and  25 mg/kg/day, respectively.

  Lennox–Gastaut Syndrome

The effectiveness of EPIDIOLEX for the treatment of seizures associated with LGS was established in two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials in patients aged 2 to 55 years (Study 1, NCT02224690; and Study 2, NCT02224560).

Study 1 (N=171) compared a dose of EPIDIOLEX 20 mg/kg/day with placebo.  Study 2 (N=225) compared a 10 mg/kg/day dose and a 20 mg/kg/day dose of EPIDIOLEX with placebo.  In both studies, patients had a diagnosis of LGS and were inadequately controlled on at least one AED, with or without vagal nerve stimulation and/or ketogenic diet. Both trials had a 4-week baseline period, during which patients were required to have a minimum of 8 drop seizures (≥ 2 drop seizures per week).  The baseline period was followed by a 2-week titration period and a 12-week maintenance period.

In Study 1, 94% of patients were taking at least 2 concomitant AEDs.  The most frequently used concomitant AEDs (greater than 25%) in Study 1 were clobazam (49%), valproate (40%), lamotrigine (37%), levetiracetam (34%), and rufinamide (27%).  In Study 2, 94% of patients were taking at least 2 concomitant AEDs.  The most frequently used concomitant AEDs (greater than 25%) in Study 2, were clobazam (49%), valproate (38%), levetiracetam (31%), lamotrigine (30%), and rufinamide (29%).

The primary efficacy measure in both studies was the percent change from baseline in the frequency (per 28 days) of drop seizures (atonic, tonic, or tonic-clonic seizures) over the 14-week treatment period. Key secondary endpoints in both studies included analyses of change in total seizure frequency and changes from baseline in the Subject/Caregiver Global Impression of Change (S/CGIC) score at the last visit.  For the S/CGIC, the following question was rated on a 7-point scale: “Since [you/your child] started treatment, please assess the status of [your/your child’s] overall condition (comparing [your/their] condition now to [your/their] condition before treatment) using the scale below.”  The 7-point scale was as follows: “Very Much Improved” (1); “Much Improved” (2); “Slightly Improved” (3); “No Change” (4); “Slightly Worse” (5); “Much Worse” (6); “Very Much Worse” (7).

In Studies 1 and 2, the median percent change from baseline (reduction) in the frequency of drop seizures was significantly greater for both dosage groups of EPIDIOLEX than for placebo (Table 5).  A reduction in drop seizures was observed within 4 weeks of initiating treatment with EPIDIOLEX, and the effect remained generally consistent over the 14-week treatment period.

aObtained from a Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

Figure 1 displays the percentage of patients by category of reduction from baseline in drop seizure frequency per 28 days during the treatment period in Study 1.   

Figure 1: Proportion of Patients by Category of Seizure Response for EPIDIOLEX and Placebo in Patients with Lennox–Gastaut Syndrome (Study 1)

Figure 2 displays the percentage of patients by category of reduction from baseline in drop seizure frequency (per 28 days) during the treatment period in Study 2.

Figure 2: Proportion of Patients by Category of Seizure Response for EPIDIOLEX and Placebo in Patients with Lennox–Gastaut Syndrome (Study 2)

In Study 1, 3 of 85 (4%) patients in the EPIDIOLEX 20 mg/kg/day group reported no drop seizures during the maintenance period, compared to 0 patients in the placebo group.  In Study 2, 3 of 73 (4%) patients in the EPIDIOLEX 10 mg/kg/day group, 5 of 76 (7%) patients in the EPIDIOLEX 20 mg/kg/day group, and 1 of 76 (1%) patients in the placebo group reported no drop seizures during the maintenance period.

In LGS patients, EPIDIOLEX was associated with significant reductions in total seizure frequency (drop and non-drop seizures) versus placebo.  During the treatment period in Study 1, the median percent reduction in total seizure frequency (per 28 days) was 41% in patients taking EPIDIOLEX 20 mg/kg/day compared to 14% in patients taking placebo (p<0.01).  In Study 2, the median percent reduction in total seizure frequency (per 28 days) was 36% in the 10 mg/kg/day group, 38% in the 20 mg/kg/day group, and 18% in the placebo group (p<0.01 for both groups).

A greater improvement on the Subject/Caregiver Global Impression of Change (S/CGIC) was reported in patients treated with EPIDIOLEX compared with placebo in Studies 1 and 2.  In Study 1, the mean S/CGIC score at last visit was 3.0 in the 20 mg/kg/day EPIDIOLEX group (corresponding to “slightly improved”) compared with 3.7 (most closely associated with “no change”) in the placebo group (p<0.01).  In Study 2, the mean S/CGIC score at last visit was 3.0 and 3.2 in the 10 mg/kg/day and 20 mg/kg/day EPIDIOLEX groups, respectively (“slightly improved”), compared with 3.6 (“no change”) in the placebo group (p<0.01 and p=0.04, respectively).

  Dravet Syndrome

The effectiveness of EPIDIOLEX for the treatment of seizures associated with DS was demonstrated in a single randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 120 patients aged 2 to 18 years (Study 3, NCT02091375).  Study 3 compared a dose of EPIDIOLEX 20 mg/kg/day with placebo.  Patients had a diagnosis of treatment-resistant DS and were inadequately controlled with at least one concomitant AED, with or without vagal nerve stimulation or ketogenic diet. During the 4-week baseline period, patients were required to have at least 4 convulsive seizures while on stable AED therapy. The baseline period was followed by a 2-week titration period and a 12-week maintenance period. The primary efficacy measure was the percent change from baseline in the frequency (per 28 days) of convulsive seizures (all countable atonic, tonic, clonic, and tonic-clonic seizures) over the 14-week treatment period.

In Study 3, 93% of patients were taking at least 2 concomitant AEDs during the trial.  The most commonly used concomitant AEDs (greater than 25%) in Study 3 were clobazam (65%), valproate (57%), stiripentol (43%), levetiracetam (28%), and topiramate (26%).

The median percent change from baseline (reduction) in the frequency of convulsive seizures was significantly greater for EPIDIOLEX 20 mg/kg/day than for placebo (Table 6).  A reduction in convulsive seizures was observed within 4 weeks of initiating treatment with EPIDIOLEX and the effect remained generally consistent over the 14-week treatment period.

aObtained from a Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

Figure 3 displays the percentage of patients by category of reduction from baseline in convulsive seizure frequency (per 28 days) during the treatment period in Study 3.

Figure 3: Proportion of Patients by Category of Seizure Response for EPIDIOLEX and Placebo in Patients with Dravet Syndrome (Study 3)

In Study 3, 4 of 60 (7%) patients treated with EPIDIOLEX 20 mg/kg/day reported no convulsive seizures during the maintenance period, compared to 0 patients in the placebo group. 

  Tuberous Sclerosis Complex

The effectiveness of EPIDIOLEX for the treatment of seizures associated with TSC was demonstrated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 224 patients aged 1 to 65 years (Study 4; NCT02544763).

Study 4 (N=224) compared doses of EPIDIOLEX 25 mg/kg/day and 50 mg/kg/day (2 times the recommended maintenance dosage) with placebo.  Patients had a diagnosis of TSC and seizures inadequately controlled with at least one concomitant AED, with or without vagal nerve stimulation or ketogenic diet.  During the 4-week baseline period, patients had at least 8 seizures, with at least 1 seizure occurring in at least 3 of the 4 weeks (focal motor seizures without impairment of consciousness or awareness; focal seizures with impairment of consciousness or awareness; focal seizures evolving to bilateral generalized convulsive seizures and generalized seizures [tonic–clonic, tonic, clonic or atonic seizures]).  The baseline period was followed by a 4-week titration period and a 12‑week maintenance period.

In Study 4, all patients but 1 (in EPIDIOLEX 25 mg/kg/day group) were taking 1-5 concomitant AEDs during the trial.  The most commonly used concomitant AEDs (greater than 25%) were valproate (45%), vigabatrin (33%), levetiracetam (29%), and clobazam (27%).  The baseline median TSC-associated seizure frequency was 57 per 28 days for the combined groups.  The primary efficacy measure was the change in seizure frequency of TSC-associated seizures over the 16-week treatment period compared with baseline.

In Study 4, the percentage change from baseline (reduction) in the frequency of TSC-associated seizures was significantly greater for patients treated with EPIDIOLEX than for placebo (Table 7).  A reduction in TSC-associated seizures was observed within 4 weeks of initiating treatment with EPIDIOLEX and the effect remained generally consistent over the 12-week maintenance period.

aObtained from a Wilcoxon rank-sum test.
bObtained from a log-transformed ANCOVA.

Figure 4 displays the percentage of patients by category of reduction from baseline in TSC-associated seizure frequency (per 28 days) during the treatment period in Study 4.

Figure 4: Proportion of Patients by Category of Seizure Response for EPIDIOLEX and Placebo in Patients with Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (Study 4)

In Study 4, 4 of 71 (6%) patients treated with EPIDIOLEX 25 mg/kg/day reported no TSC-associated seizures during the maintenance period, compared to 0 patients in the placebo group.